Pubdate: Thu, 03 Mar 2005
Source: Deseret Morning News (Salt Lake City, UT)
Copyright: 2005 Deseret News Publishing Corp.
Contact:  http://www.desnews.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/124
Author: Josh Loftin And Geoffrey Fattah, Deseret Morning News

DORA PROVES TOO DAUNTING ON HILL

Even after reducing the initial costs of the Drug Offenders Reform Act and 
tying it to funding for a veterans nursing home in Ogden, the potentially 
high cost of a program they knew little about remained too daunting for 
representatives.

As late as Wednesday morning and two days after many supporters had 
pronounced it practically dead, DORA appeared to still have a fighting 
chance at some funding. The primary reason was an amendment to SB1, which 
provides $150 million in one-time funding for this fiscal year, by House 
members who gave $4.5 million Monday to help build the home.

After the amendment, senators insisted that if they agreed to fund the 
home, then DORA would also get funded. Representatives balked at that 
demand, however, because the price tag for DORA started at $6 million and 
escalated by $6 million each year.

Legislative leaders went so far as to work out an agreement Tuesday night 
after DORA was pared down to a pilot program costing $4.5 million in 
one-time money and $1.5 million for the next three years. The agreement 
gave the Republican caucuses two options: fund both the DORA pilot program 
and the veterans home, or fund neither. House Republicans, in a unanimous 
decision, chose the latter.

House Speaker Greg Curtis said that even without the daunting cost, the 
lack of debate about DORA in the House meant that a lot of representatives 
simply did not understand the program well enough to fund it confidently. 
Even with the pilot program concept, they were hesitant to proceed.

"If we had reached an agreement on the pilot program two weeks ago, it 
could have been different," Curtis said. "People just didn't understand it. 
Those who did were the biggest advocates, but there (were) 50 
representatives who barely knew about it."

Supporters of DORA, which has actually been talked about in both houses in 
the previous two years but never funded, say Utah's justice system is 
filled with people struggling with substance abuse problems, driving some 
to commit crimes to feed their habits, such as theft and fraud. With 80 
percent of Utah inmates having a foundational drug problem, experts say 
more drug treatment needs to be provided to break the cycle of what they 
see as a revolving-door justice system.

Yet those within Utah's drug addiction treatment community say they have 
tried to convince legislators that the multimillion-dollar investment now 
will spell savings not only in future prison costs but costs associated 
with homelessness, child abuse, domestic violence and medical care.

"I'm disappointed that they missed an opportunity to tackle a very serious 
problem that would be effective in reducing problems and effective in 
reducing overall costs," said Glenn Lambert, director of Odyssey House in 
Salt Lake City, who also lamented a missed opportunity with so much spare 
revenue. "I think this was a great shot, but I think it will be back next 
year. It's too important a concept and it has too much support."

The decision also hit war veterans hard, as they realized that their last 
and possibly best chance at funding for the home had dissipated.

"We're leaving here thinking that what the opponents wanted -- not getting 
a facility -- is going to happen," said Frank Maughan, the Utah commander 
for the Disabled American Veterans.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth