Pubdate: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 Source: Regina Leader-Post (CN SN) Copyright: 2005 The Leader-Post Ltd. Contact: http://www.canada.com/regina/leaderpost/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/361 Author: Murray Mandryk Note: Mandryk is political columnist for the Leader-Post. Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) LIBERALS SHOULD FORGET MARIJUANA LAW CHANGES I was having lunch with a couple of staunch Liberals the other day and one of them made an interesting observation about a big problem facing Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority government right now. The federal Liberals have placed far too much emphasis on their social agenda, the Liberal said. It makes for bad policy because the government can't focus on any one thing. It also makes for bad politics because people don't want that much social policy change at any given time. The wise Liberal was right. Martin's biggest problem right now is a social agenda that has grown too broad -- and in some cases, too bold - -- for him to handle. You think they would have learned. After all, the Liberals have spent much of the last decade waging a losing war to justify the social policy that is the federal gun registry. The result has been a billion-dollar boondoggle and a lot of Western alienation. Undaunted, they went from the issue of gun control right into gay marriage -- an issue they might be receiving more credit for as politically courageous and progressive were they able to focus on selling the policy rather than attempting to sell other policies. And now, the Liberal noted, delegates at the party's federal convention in Ottawa are deeply embroiled in the issues of missile defence (which should really be categorized in Canada as a social issue rather than a military one), legalized prostitution (now being promoted by one Senator) and the decriminalization of marijuana. "The public may accept two of five issues, but it's that third issue that has them saying they'll vote for someone else," the Liberal said, adding, that sooner or later, one of those issues explodes in the government's face. "It becomes the straw that breaks the camel's back." I left lunch, got in my car turned on my car radio and heard the stomach-turning news that four RCMP officers had been shot to death in a raid of a northern Alberta marijuana grow operation. And I couldn't help thinking about what my Liberal friend said about a government pushing too many social policies until you encounter that one that breaks the camel back. Martin and the federal Liberals need to alter course on their marijuana law -- not just for political reasons, but because it's the right thing to do right now. The only thing right now that could be more tragic than the deaths of the four constables would be for their deaths to be in vain because of the federal Liberals' stubborn insistence on maintaining their wrong-headed direction. Perhaps those federal Liberals and others who have deemed marijuana a harmless drug with no consequences should try and explain that to the families of the fallen officers. RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli may have put it best when he called grow operations "a major, serious threat" and "a plague on our society now." Zaccardelli offered graphic detail of the dangers his officers face in dealing with the increasingly lucrative grow op industries -- the very same dangers that culminated in tragic consequences near Mayerthorpe, Alta, Thursday where 46-year-old James Roszko gunned down the four officers. In fairness to the federal Liberals, the new marijuana law before the Commons does call for somewhat tougher maximum sentences for grow operators -- as much as five years in jail for those caught with three or more plants, 10 years for those 25 plants and 14 years for operations with 50 plants. Unfortunately, the legislation has more problems than solutions beginning with a lack of minimum sentences for dealers and grow operators. However, a bigger problem with the federal bill reintroduced last November is the decriminalization of possession of 15 grams or less -- an offence that would be subject to a $150 fine (or $100 fine for minors) rather than a criminal record. This move has obviously displeased the police. "We don't solve anything in society by legalizing things or by pretending they're not harmful to society," Zaccardelli said at his press conference. Evidently, federal Liberals feel otherwise. Actually, the government's argument that it makes more sense to clamp down on dealers and growers than those possessing a small amount of pot for personal use does make some sense. But the problem here is twofold. First, the courts and police have already pretty much "de-criminalized" small possession by not prosecuting such cases very often. Second, anything that makes marijuana use more socially acceptable (and, by the way, why do we want do that when we are trying to "de-normalize" cigarettes?) runs the risk of increasing the marketplace, thus creating more illegal and dangerous grow ops. Naturally, some federal Liberals think they have a solution to that, too. A resolution at their convention this weekend calls on the government to completely legalize marijuana and tax it as a means of controlling the drug traffic. Yes, there are Liberals who seriously think the lucrative illegal marijuana growing trade -- the entire $7-billion annual industry in B.C. -- will fold up shop, register with the feds and gleefully fork over hefty portions of their ill-gotten to the federal government in the form of taxes. Apparently no thought was given to the notion that such criminals would just go deeper underground to grow tax-free pot. There again, these were the same people who once thought registering your guns would stop murders. Perhaps they should also explain that to the relatives of the four dead Mounties or the families of the three people murdered in Montreal Lake. Their new marijuana law has now become the one social agenda issue that the Liberals are pushing too far. To continue to push it is to do so at their own peril. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake