Pubdate: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 Source: Post and Courier, The (Charleston, SC) Copyright: 2005 Evening Post Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.charleston.net/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/567 Author: David Slade Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Test) CITY COUNCIL WANTS DRUG TESTS FOR ITS MEMBERS Officials Say They Should Be Held To Same Standard As City Employees Charleston City Councilman Kwadjo Campbell arrived at the first City Council meeting since being charged with marijuana possession just as Councilman Paul Tinkler proposed that council members be subjected to drug testing. Tinkler said members of City Council should be held to the same standard as city employees, who can be tested for drugs upon reasonable suspicion of illegal drug use. "If you play for the South Carolina Gamecocks and you test positive for marijuana, you can be kicked off the team," he said, drawing another contrast with City Council rules. Campbell did not object to Tinkler's drug-testing plan and joined him in voting for the idea, but later called Tinkler "a pawn of the mayor." Tinkler previously had said he supports Mayor Joe Riley's call for Campbell to resign while awaiting trial on charges stemming from two separate arrests last month. Campbell, 33, was charged with second-offense marijuana possession in Charleston on Feb. 24, after he was stopped while riding in a car that had been reported stolen. Campbell's female companion, a 24-year-old college student, told police that a marijuana "blunt" found in the car was the councilman's, according to a police report. The owner of the car later said he had mistakenly reported it stolen. Campbell, who pleaded guilty to marijuana possession in 1996 and served a probationary term, awaits trial on the misdemeanor possession charge. Just days before his arrest in Charleston, Campbell was charged with driving with a suspended license and giving false information to police in Summerville, after he was pulled over for driving a car with a broken tail light. Several residents of Campbell's East Side district spoke in his defense at the council meeting Tuesday night. "The charges against Kwadjo Campbell are just that, charges," said Jackie Cord, who asked Riley to stay out of the issue and leave it in the hands of the courts, and ultimately the voters. Some council members questioned Tinkler's drug-testing idea, and his motives, while Campbell listened silently. "I wish someone would really tell me the reason for it," said Councilman James Lewis. "I'd sure like to see what the legality of this is all about." The legal issue is that, under the Charleston City Code, members of City Council forfeit their seats if they are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. Riley has urged the council to eject Campbell if he is convicted of marijuana possession, but South Carolina courts have ruled that simple possession of marijuana is not a crime involving moral turpitude. Councilman Robert George suggested that Tinkler was attempting to redefine moral turpitude, as it applies to council members."To me, moral turpitude is cheating on your wife, or misrepresenting how you live," George said. "If we open that issue up, we'll be opening up a big bag of worms." Council ended up voting 11-1 to direct the city's legal staff to examine the legality of applying drug-testing rules to members of council. The motion also called for the staff to see if other elective bodies require such testing in South Carolina. Lewis cast the only vote against the measure. Later, outside the Reuben Greenberg Municipal Building, Campbell said that if drug testing were to be instituted for council members, and were he asked to take one, he "would gladly take the test." He said he was gratified by the people who spoke in his defense at the council meeting and has been hearing an outpouring of support from constituents all week. Tinkler insisted his drug-testing measure wasn't aimed at Campbell. "I'll concede that it's a timely topic," he said. "It's aimed at addressing the fact that City Council members are exempt from rules we require city employees to follow." - --- MAP posted-by: Beth