Pubdate: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 Source: Berkshire Eagle, The (Pittsfield, MA) Copyright: 2005 New England Newspapers, Inc. Contact: http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/897 Author: Ira J. Kaplan Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v05.n499.a09.html DISCRETION CALLED FOR IN DRUG CASE A March 24 letter to the editor supported the prosecution, without exception, of school-zone charges carrying a minimum two-year sentence against all of the young people charged in the Triplex sting operation. The writer, Robin Mazzantini, asked, "Who are the more than 400 people who signed [the petition urging prosecutorial discretion]? Are they all relatives or close family friends?" As a former assistant district attorney who has prosecuted, and now defends, school-zone cases, I stand with the more than 400 people asking the district attorney to use the discretion that comes with his office to decide whether any of these young people should face a two-year mandatory minimum sentence and felony conviction. The school-zone charge, with its mandatory sentence, is a blunt instrument. It works as a penalty enhancement that may be tacked on to any charge of selling, or possessing drugs with the intent of selling, within 1,000 feet of a school property, whether college or day-care, whether in session or not. It applies to marijuana in any quantity and it applies whether or not the person charged is a first-time offender. It gives the district attorney the power to send a third-time offender selling crack cocaine on the steps of a middle school to state prison for two additional years. A district attorney can also, if he or she chooses, send a 17-year-old high school student with absolutely no record to prison for two years for selling a joint, blocks away from any school property. The Legislature armed district attorneys with the school-zone charge with the expectation that a district attorney would go after the first defendant but would use his constitutionally granted prerogative to consider mitigating factors when dealing with the second. The job of the district attorney is to decide, on behalf of the citizens of Berkshire County, when it is appropriate to seek the two-year penalty. Unfortunately, in Berkshire County, school-zone cases regularly go to trial without regard to the costs, both human and fiscal. District Attorney Capeless has agreed to listen to, and consider, alternatives to the school-zone penalty in the Triplex cases. He is to be applauded for this. Ms. Mazzantini asks: "If these teens were black and in the west side of the city, would they get the same consideration?" They should. Ira J. Kaplan Great Barrington - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin