Pubdate: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 Source: Newport Daily News, The (RI) Section: From The Statehouse (Column) Copyright: 2005. The Newport Daily News. Contact: http://www.newportdailynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1808 Author: Joe Baker, Daily News Staff Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) SENATOR HUFFS AND PUFFS OVER MARIJUANA BILL Watching the over-the-top display from one state senator during a legislative hearing last week made me feel like using a retort favored by my friends more than 20 years ago: "You don't have to be a jerk just because you know how." Of course, we didn't use the word "jerk" back then, but the meaning remains the same. The hearing was on legislation that would allow the medical use of marijuana. Ten states already have a similar law, which would allow people with debilitating diseases to seek prescriptions for marijuana to control their symptoms. Even in relatively conservative, Republican Arizona, the bill was overwhelmingly approved in a voter referendum. Some could be forgiven for the knee-jerk reaction that the bill is a back-door attempt to legalize marijuana. But after reading restrictions included in the legislation and listening to testimony of those who experience the kind of pain healthy people couldn't even imagine, thoughtful people should be able to get beyond that. The first witness last Tuesday was a 42-year-old registered nurse with multiple sclerosis. The woman described her symptoms. She had never used marijuana, she said, but would if she could. After the woman answered a few questions posed by committee members, Sen. Leo R. Blais, R-Coventry, piped up. Rather than asking a question, Blais used his time to rail against the legislation as nothing more than an attempt to legalize pot. If it passed, he said, his voice rising in indignation, everyone who strained their back raking leaves would be getting marijuana prescriptions. There are plenty of prescriptive drugs out there to alleviate pain and other symptoms, said Blais, a pharmacist. "This will continue to promote drug use in our kids and in our adults," Blais railed. When the bill's sponsor, Sen. Rhoda Perry, D-Providence, pointed out the safeguards in the bill aimed at preventing misuse, Blais sat there, hiding a grin behind a raised hand. Minutes later, Blais walked out of the hearing, having thrown his bomb. He never heard the testimony from three physicians, including the former head of the psychology and neuroscience department at Brown University, relating the scientific evidence supporting the use of marijuana to alleviate symptoms of people with serious diseases such as cancer, AIDS, epilepsy and multiple sclerosis. Blais did not hear the testimony that, unlike many of the drugs Blais himself dispenses, marijuana does not have serious side effects and is not addictive. The evidence and personal experience did prompt one committee member to change his view on the issue. Sen. Michael J. Damiani, D-East Providence, a retired policeman, opposed the bill last year, but this year signed on as a co-sponsor. His conversion came after he saw several people close to him suffer from cancer. "Anything I can do to make their lives easier ... seems like a good thing to do," Damiani said. It seems so logical. If marijuana could ease the vomiting and lack of appetite for a cancer patient undergoing chemotherapy, why not allow it? If, as described at the hearing, marijuana helps calm the violent tremors of MS patients, why deny them that relief? If marijuana can ease the pain and suffering of an end-game AIDS patient, what is the objection? Doctors prescribe and pharmacists provide far more serious drugs with potentially harmful side effects to control those symptoms now. And not one doctor came forward to detail any harmful effects marijuana might have on a patient. Would legalizing marijuana for medical use, as Blais claims, cause young people to lurch toward reefer madness? No more so than seeing their parent take prescription drugs to control their symptoms would push them toward drug abuse. One potential side effect, though, just might be compassion for people who are suffering. - --- MAP posted-by: Elizabeth Wehrman