Pubdate: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 Source: Albuquerque Journal (NM) Copyright: 2005 Albuquerque Journal Contact: http://www.abqjournal.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/10 Author: Andrea Schoellkopf, Journal Staff Writer Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) MARIJUANA BILL HELD HOSTAGE BY IMPACT FEES Legislation to restrict Albuquerque's impact fees and a bill to legalize medical marijuana may have fallen victim to last-minute political squabbling. House Bill 805 and its sister, Senate Bill 1005, which would have prohibited cities and counties from using impact fees as a tool to control growth, died early Saturday morning when the Senate's Judiciary Committee didn't have a six-member quorum to vote. The Judiciary Committee chairman contends his medical marijuana bill was subsequently allowed to "die" on the House floor in retaliation. State Sen. Cisco McSorley said impact fee bill co-sponsors Reps. Dan Silva and Kiki Saavedra were angry that their bill did not get out of his committee. "They retaliated by killing the medical marijuana bill on final reading," McSorley said Monday. Silva countered that McSorley and Senate Majority Leader Michael S. Sanchez, D-Belen, were to blame for the impact fee bill not making it to the Senate floor. "He refused to hear (the impact fee bill) in Judiciary," said Silva, a Westgate resident and Albuquerque Democrat. According to The Associated Press, Silva said last week he was working to delay the medical marijuana bill because of the holdup on his impact fee bill. McSorley's medical marijuana bill passed the Senate and had been waiting on the House floor since March 13. The Legislature adjourned at noon Saturday without the House taking a vote on the marijuana bill. "It was clearly money over mercy," McSorley said. "This will possibly be a life and death matter to people who may not take marijuana." Saavedra, a South Valley Democrat, said the House didn't vote on medical marijuana use "just like Cisco McSorley never got to the impact fee bill." "It was scheduled," Saavedra said. "And the speaker never got to it." Silva said Albuquerque's new impact fee structure was regressive and unfairly charges first-time home buyers on the West Side. The new fee structure charges higher impact fees for building in newly developed areas such as the city's West Side. "They refused to hear my bill," Silva said. "I was there till 4:30 to 5 o'clock in the morning on Saturday morning. They still wouldn't hear my bill." Both McSorley and Sen. Linda Lopez, D-Albuquerque, who also represents part of Silva's area, say time ran out before the impact fee bill could be considered by the Judiciary Committee. However, they said it likely wouldn't have gone to the Senate floor because the committee was expected to split 5-5 on the impact fee bill. "The bill would've died," McSorley said. He said only three of the 10 committee members showed up for the 4:30 a.m. meeting, and six were needed for a quorum. Several of those missing were Democrats attending a caucus at the same time, he said. "That's just the way the committee structure works," said Lopez, who sits on the committee but was instead attending the early morning Democratic caucus. "There was just too much on the plate." Lopez said the impact fee bills would have been detrimental to the West Side because of its heavy infrastructure needs. "I'm glad in all honesty the bill did not pass," she said. McSorley said he had known since last Monday that the marijuana bill was being held up for the impact fees, a practice he called "unethical." The impact fee bill was one of about 10 bills that didn't get out of the Judiciary Committee, McSorley said. "I made no apology," said McSorley, who represents the University of New Mexico area. "There were plenty of other bills, all of which deserved the same consideration. I was hearing the bills, more-or-less in the order of how I got them. "In effect, Kiki and Dan Silva wanted preferential treatment for their bill, and I wouldn't give it to them." McSorley said he believed the impact fee bills would have placed a greater burden on Albuquerque residents to cover West Side streets, sewers, schools, parks and fire services. "My constituents in my neighborhoods are paying for all that sprawl out on the West Side," he said. "... there's no money for the city to renew the infrastructure in the rest of town." Joe Valles, president of the Westside Coalition of Neighborhood Association who had been actively campaigning against the impact fee bill, called McSorley's loss of the medical marijuana bill "political hardball" in an e-mail Saturday afternoon. "Our position to oppose this legislation was based primarily on protecting our home rule-- local control," Valles said. The Associated Press contributed to this report. - --- MAP posted-by: Elizabeth Wehrman