Pubdate: Thu, 19 May 2005
Source: Ukiah Daily Journal, The (CA)
Copyright: 2005 The Ukiah Daily Journal
Contact:  http://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/581
Author: Michael Riemenschneider
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization)

COUNCIL PASSES 45 DAY MORATORIUM OF NEW MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES

Only in Mendocino County

For a variety of reasons, and from a variety of different political 
persuasions, the Ukiah City Council Wednesday night unanimously approved a 
temporary moratorium on new medicinal marijuana dispensaries. Also by 
consensus, staff was requested to quickly develop zoning regulations for 
future cannabis clubs.

The matter was introduced by City Attorney David Rapport. An urgency 
ordinance going into effect immediately, the moratorium would prohibit 
construction of new dispensaries within city limits. The two existing clubs 
will not be allowed to expand their businesses, but otherwise will not be 
affected. If new zoning laws are not created by July 2, the council can 
extend the moratorium for up to 10 months.

Surprisingly, the matter did not provoke a lengthy debate. Only three 
members of the public addressed the council, and all three spoke against 
the moratorium.

Of note, Dane Wilkins, director of the Northern California National 
Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) drew parallels 
between medicinal marijuana and Prohibition, calling Ukiah's current 
situation "neither an urgency (n)or emergency." Local physician, Dr. Peter 
Keegan offered accepted corrections to language in the moratorium, and 
heavily critiqued the ordinance. His comments of two weeks ago also incited 
some questions from the council.

It was the discussion following public comment, however, which was interesting.

Mayor Mark Ashiku pushed both the moratorium and an expedited conclusion to it.

"So the real question then becomes, do we want a marijuana dispensary 
immediately adjacent to a school, do we want it next to the Boys Club and 
Girls Club? These are decisions that we don't seem to have any problem with 
as it relates to a liquor store," declared the mayor in favor of zoning 
regulations.

Councilmember John McCowen, originally responsible for the discussion and 
ordinance, shared the mayor's sentiment. He did not wish for the general 
prohibition of clubs, just for their expedited regulation.

Worried about the potential legality of the matter, Councilmember Mari 
Rodin seemed to share sentiment with both Rapport and Keegan. She asked 
about problems the city has had with dispensaries as well as their 
proliferation. Without any particular problems and no new clubs in the 
plans, Rodin wavered.

Rapport, however, assured her the courts are "indulgent" and would not 
present significant concerns. Plus, with regulations imminent, it would 
behoove future dispensaries to be guided by the appropriate zoning laws.

Councilmember Phil Baldwin added his general concerns, particularly about 
the highly profitable nature of dispensaries. Full legalization, according 
to this official, is the only way to deal with the problem.

Ultimately, the entire council, including Councilmember Doug Crane, voted 
in support of the moratorium as well as a request of the development of 
zoning regulations. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Elizabeth Wehrman