Pubdate: Thu, 31 Aug 2006
Source: Daily Mail (UK)
Copyright: 2006 Associated Newspapers Ltd
Contact:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/108
Author: James Slack
Note: The Office for National Statistics quarterly bulletin is on 
line as a 104 page .pdf file at 
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_health/HSQ31.pdf
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/area/United+Kingdom

CANNABIS DOWNGRADE COINCIDES WITH DRUG DEATHS RISE

Drug deaths spiralled after Labour downgraded cannabis, it has been
revealed.

The number of people killed by overdoses surged by almost 15 per cent
in the next year.

Critics had warned that the decision to reclassify cannabis from Class
B to C in January 2004, meaning simple possession was unlikely to lead
to arrest, would lead to a surge in the use of all illegal drugs.

An internal Downing Street report later admitted that people trying
cannabis had been lured on to deadly harder drugs.

As a result, deaths from heroin, cocaine and Ecstasy all rocketed
figures from the Office of National Statistics showed yesterday.

The increase meant the Government failed to meet its target of
reducing drug deaths by a fifth between 1999 and 2004. Before the
reclassification of cannabis, it was on course to do so easily.

Tory spokesman Edward Garnier said: 'Labour continues to fail to deal
with the scourge of drugs.

'Drugs take lives and tear apart communities. They also undermine all
our efforts to combat crime. The Government needs to get an urgent
grip on this problem but so far all we have had is a chaotic and
confused approach that gives the impression it is OK to take drugs.'

Mary Brett, of the Europe Against Drugs campaign, said it appeared
much more than simple coincidence that the alarming rise in deaths had
followed the downgrading of cannabis.

She said: 'Cannabis is a gateway drug, most people agree that now. A
person smokes it and they are then far more likely to go on to take a
harder drug. The Government will no doubt come up with excuses as to
why the number of deaths has increased, saying the drugs were stronger.

But that cannot be the whole explanation. 'It is a significant
increase and how many of those who died were, for example, first-time
users?'

In 1999, the Government promised to reduce drug deaths by 20 per cent
over the next five years. Following the pledge, the numbers fell each
year, from 1,571 in 1999, to 1,255 in 2003. At this point, the target
was hit a year early. But in 2004 the death toll suddenly shot up by
14 per cent, to 1,427.

The number of heroin deaths was up from 591 in 2003 to 744, cocaine
from 113 to 147 and Ecstasy from 33 to 48.

The Health Department said last night that, despite the rise in deaths
last year, there had been a nine per cent reduction overall since 1999.

Within the total, however, there was a 67 per cent increase in cocaine
deaths, from 88 in 1999 to 147, and Ecstasy fatalities were up 85 per
cent, from 26 to 48. Both figures reflect wider use.

The department has now reconvened its Drug Related Deaths Steering
Group, a panel of experts which will produce a plan of action later
this year on how to reduce the toll. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake