Pubdate: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 Source: Exponent, The (IN Edu) Copyright: 2006 Purdue Exponent Contact: http://www.purdueexponent.org/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/883 Cited: Students for Sensible Drug Policy http://www.daregeneration.com Cited: American Civil Liberties Union http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/ Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hea.htm (Higher Education Act) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?225 (Students - United States) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?219 (Students for Sensible Drug Policy) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) GROUPS SUE FOR FINANCIAL AID FOR DRUG OFFENDERS Last week, the ACLU and Students for Sensible Drug Policy filed a suit against the Department of Education because of a federal law they want overturned. As it stands now, the law states that the government will stop funding students who are convicted of a drug charge while they are receiving federal financial aid. The student group and the ACLU, however, feel that this law is unconstitutional. How, exactly, is this unconstitutional? How could these people possibly consider this law unfair? Students receiving aid know that if they are involved with drugs, they could lose their funds. And if they still decide to take part in these illegal activities, then they have absolutely no reason to complain when their aid is severed. There is nothing unconstitutional about this. There is nothing unfair about this. What would be unfair, however, is if the law does get overturned, and taxpayers' money is used for convicted drug offenders. The government should not be expected to hand out money to people who do not even take the country's drug laws seriously. The groups also say that the law is counterproductive, as students who are drug offenders have already been punished enough. According to the Web site insidehighered.com, the lawsuit states that the law "interferes with the objectives of drug treatment, drug prevention and criminal rehabilitation by denying a higher education ... to those convicted." But the government doesn't have the leisure of assuming that drug offenders will become rehabilitated. Because if they don't, then the government may have very well wasted a lot of money on people who won't make use of it. There are so many law-abiding students out there that need aid that the Department of Education cannot afford to gamble their money on people who do not deserve it. This law is not infringing on anyone's rights, and it's not unconstitutional. The Students for Sensible Drug Policy and the ACLU should withdraw their lawsuit before they embarrass themselves more.