Pubdate: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 Source: London Free Press (CN ON) Copyright: 2006 The London Free Press Contact: http://www.lfpress.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/243 Author: Ian Gillespie LIBRARY IN A TOUGH POSITION ON NEEDLE ISSUE According to some readers, I'm a stupid, ignorant and unfeeling fellow who's guilty of perpetuating negative stereotypes about the homeless. I think a careful reading of yesterday's column (or maybe even a superficial skim) would prove otherwise. But I suppose idealists don't have time to trifle with details. In case you missed it, yesterday's column questioned the wisdom of placing needle dispenser bins in the washrooms at London's Central Library on Dundas Street. The bins are being placed in the men's and women's washrooms on three floors of the downtown library -- but not, however, in the washrooms in the children's section. The placement of the bins was prompted by a sad bit of reality. Library workers were finding used syringes on washroom floors, in toilets and in garbage bins. Retrieving those needles posed an obvious safety hazard; the library's solution was to install special disposal bins. In response to my column, one reader stated in a letter to the editor: "People who abuse drugs and alcohol have a right to use the library just as much as I do, and probably have a greater need for its many resources." I wholeheartedly agree. But I definitely don't believe anyone has "a right" to do drugs in the library. Because if they do that, they're breaking the law -- just as they would be if they decided to drain a mug of beer, suck on a burning cigarette or view Internet kiddie porn while in the library. If you ask me, breaking the rules is breaking the rules -- no matter who you are or what are your problems. Somehow, some readers concluded I was urging the library to ban homeless people. Nothing could be further from the truth. I am suggesting, however, that the library is making it too easy for people to shoot up in its washrooms, and that accommodating drug users is driving away legitimate patrons. I mean, do you really want your children to visit a library where addicts are shooting up in the washroom? One reader wrote that by suggesting that security guards identify and then oust drug users, I was guilty of a "vicious form of profiling." Well, I guess we differ. I call the guy who steals your car "a thief." But I suppose that reader would simply label him "a symptom of a poor economy." Several readers posed a more valid question: Who would pay for the security needed to post people outside each washroom and then, when a patron departed, check to see if they left behind a needle? I put the question to Bill Irwin, the library's director of community relations and development. He pointed out that city commissionaires handle security at the downtown library, and there are usually two or three on duty. Irwin emphasized there are video cameras mounted outside the washrooms (but not inside) that are monitored by staff. Irwin also said the library has a policy allowing staff to ban patrons for periods of up to a year or more, and that during the past month about eight people have been banned. He also said London police's foot patrol officers regularly tour the library. "We're trying to find a balance here and it's difficult," said Irwin. "Our research has shown that every public building in Halifax, for instance, has these (needle disposal) units in the washrooms. We're just catching up to the reality of being a large, urban centre." Irwin said it's unlikely the library could afford extra security. And though some readers questioned the wisdom of even publicizing the situation, Irwin disagreed. "I think the attention this issue has gotten . . . has raised the whole level of vigilance," he said. "And hopefully something positive has come out of this." To be honest, I sympathize with library staff, who find themselves between a rock and a hard place. But I can only shake my head at the "society-is-to-blame" stance of those who feel the only solution to this situation is to admit defeat and to do our best to accommodate the drug-addled lawbreakers. If we've got addicts shooting up in library washrooms, then I'm afraid we've already lost. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake