Pubdate: Wed, 11 Jan 2006
Source: Peninsula News Review (CN BC)
Copyright: 2006 Peninsula News Review
Contact:  http://www.peninsulanewsreview.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1373
Author: Laura Lavin
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada)

NO SURPRISES FROM CANDIDATES

There were no surprises in the federal all-candidates  meeting last 
Thursday evening. Liberal candidate Sheila  Orr began the opening 
statements and set the tone for  the others singing the praises of 
her party's leader  Paul Martin. Conservative MP Gary Lunn hyped 
Stephen Harper, NDP candidate Jennifer Burgis promoted Jack  Layton 
as leader, however Green Party candidate Andrew  Lewis spoke of a 
crisis in leadership, without  mentioning Green Party leader Jim 
Harris by name as an  alternative.

Written questions from the audience of about 200 were  directed to 
individual candidates and were asked by  moderator, A Channel 
anchor/reporter Stephen Andrew.

The first of approximately 25 questions was posed to  incumbent MP Lunn.

"Are you for privatized health care in any form?"

"The most important thing is health care when Canadians  need it. 
Right across Canada there's private health  care where some people 
who can afford to go in and pay  for it. I'm not opposed - we 
shouldn't just put on our  blinders and say no to it. We should at 
least be prepared to explore that and see if we can get 
greater  value for Canadians and their money," said Lunn.

Burgis answered the question next: "No I am not for  private health 
care in any form. The more we see an  erosion of our health care, we 
have no longer a handle  on what we can deliver equitably with costs 
to the  people who most deserve it. I think the best examples  of 
public clinics which are now attached to acute care  hospitals in 
Toronto, Winnipeg, Saskatchewan, Alberta  are fine examples of how we 
can alleviate wait lists  using the public health care system."

Lewis was next to answer: "We already have a mix of  public, private 
health care system, our doctors are  private providers. We also have 
many health care  services which are provided privately such as labs 
and  other sundry services. I am against a two-tier system  in which 
we have two-tiers of health care providers  where the rich can buy 
and the rest of us have to wait  in line."

Orr was the final candidate to answer the question: "We  have huge 
pressure on our health care system. I believe  we need to find ways 
to use our health care system to  support everybody. Today the Prime 
Minister announced a  new wait list strategy and it goes like this, 
if you  can get the service, if it's a hip replacement and 
that  service can be given to you in Alberta and not here, we  will 
fly you to Alberta. A lot of people go down to the  States and get 
their surgery done and pay for it  themselves, why should you have to 
do that? You paid  into the system, you deserve to go anywhere to get 
that  done."

The next question asked candidates: aEWhat is your  long-term vision 
for Canada and what would you hope to  achieve in the next four years 
to make progress towards  that vision?'

"My long-term vision of Canada is a country that  regains its 
position in the world, regains the respect  that Canada has 
internationally. A Canada that  preserves the very special things 
that make us Canadian aE" preserves medicare, preserves public 
pension plans,  makes sure that our young people have the training 
and  education that they need," answered Burgis.

Lewis answered next: "My vision for Canada is to be  able to leave it 
in a way that is more diverse, more  just for my children and 
grandchildren. I hope that my  children will be able to see whales 
and I hope they'll  be able to climb trees and I hope they'll be able 
to drink clean water and breathe clean air. One of the  things I 
would push for as Green Party MP is to amend  the charter of rights 
and freedoms to guarantee clean  air, clean water and clean soil for 
our future."

Orr was next to the microphone: "To make sure the  economy continues 
growing. To make sure our children  are taken care of, and by that I 
mean we need lots of  money for early childhood programs so that 
those little  guys who are just being born will get a start 
that's  going to meet their needs. I believe in peace, I  believe in 
tolerance. I will always fight against war.  I do believe that the 
health care system is the number  one priority right now."

Lunn was next to answer: "Ultimately I think we have to  ensure that 
young people can realize their dreams and  aspirations. I think we're 
missing those opportunities  every single day. If we create a strong 
economy and  protect our environment so these people can flourish, 
our economies will grow and we will have the resources  we need so we 
can improve our health care but at the  end of the day, four years 
from now we want to be able  to look back and say our economy's 
stronger, we've done  more to protect our environment our society's 
stronger  and that people are generally doing better than they  were 
when we started office."

Questions were then posed to individual candidates.  None were 
directed at Lewis, so moderator Andrew posed  some based on Lewis' 
opening remarks.

A question posed to Lunn asked, "Mr. Harper promises to  rescind both 
same-sex marriage and safe injection site  legislation would you 
please explain the reason behind  these decisions."

"Stephen Harper made a commitment to Canadians last  spring that 
there would be a free-vote on same-sex  marriage and when Stephen 
Harper gives you his word,  you can take it to the bank. He's not 
going to go against his word just because it might be the 
popular  thing to do. This issue is not front and centre on 
our  radar screen. He said we'll have a free-vote aE" if it  fails, 
that's the end of it; if it passes, you know  we'll look at civil 
unions, we'll protect those who  have already been married, we will 
not use the  not-withstanding clause," said Lunn.

Andrew then posed a question to Lewis: "In your opening  statement 
you mentioned electoral reform, do you really  believe this is the 
number one issue in this campaign?"

"Yes I do. An election should not be happening now.  We're 16 months 
into a term and the two parties ganged  up on the Liberals. I don't 
wish to defend the Liberals  here aE" they played the game as well by 
coming up with  all sorts of goodies before the election. We need 
parties to be able to work together and this is not  happening with 
the culture in parliament at the moment  and I think we have a 
parliamentary stalemate. We'll be  at this again in 2007 if we're 
going to have a minority  government because the Bloc holds the 
country to  ransom. The unity of the country is at risk and we need 
to change the parliamentary system to move ahead,"  Lewis answered.

Another question was posed to all candidates: "I  propose there 
should be no more corporate tax cuts  until Canada meets its Kyoto 
and international aid  commitments."

"We need to stop subsidizing a lot of our industries in  this 
country. We need to use our tax system and our  subsidy system to 
meet the values and needs of  Canadians," said Lewis.

"I really believe the Liberals need to do better and  will do better 
on the Kyoto accord. Making headway is  not easy and society is hard 
to change. To go after  corporations, let's be honest, it's 
businesses that  generate wealth and generate jobs. I know that a lot 
of  people who think aEwell they're rich and they  shouldn't get 
richer,' but hey folks, that's life,  that's Canada," said Orr.

"We're in favour of cutting taxes not only for  individuals, but for 
small businesses. Fifty per cent  of the GDP [Gross Domestic Product] 
in this country  comes from small businesses with a handful of 
employees. I think there's a lot of things we can do to  reduce 
greenhouse gases, we need to find tax incentives  for people to buy 
more fuel-efficient cars. Whatever  policies we implement, we want to 
make sure we're  getting results," said Lunn.

"Yes, let's stop corporate tax cuts, we don't need  them. We have $50 
to 60 billion in surplus in this  country that's not being applied 
the way Canadians  would like it to be applied - Kyoto and our 
foreign affairs commitments should be met aE" they are  decreasing by 
the day," answered Burgis.

Another question was asked of Lunn: "When the US  invaded Iraq in 
2003 you and your party were then  critical of our government's 
decision not to take part  in the aEcoalition of the willing' when 
asked about  this now you and Stephen Harper say only that you 
will  not send troops. My question is, do you now morally  support 
the US invasion and occupation of Iraq?"

"No - we have never supported sending troops to Iraq -  The Americans 
are one of our traditional allies and  always have been. This war - 
and the one in Afghanistan  have not been easy ones. Quite frankly we 
never had the  troops to send - yes, we thought we should have been 
there. Morally supportive of our friends when they are  put in harm's 
way, we have never committed to sending  troops to Iraq and we're 
probably on the record saying  we would not commit our men and women 
in uniform to  Iraq," said Lunn.

All candidates were asked, "What is your and your  party's position 
on the legalization of marijuana?"

"I'm opposed," answered Lunn. "I think it's the wrong  message to 
send to our young people - Marijuana, what  does it lead to? Young 
people are trying marijuana,  then do they go on to cocaine or try 
crystal meth. I  think it's the wrong message to send to our 
young  people, legalizing marijuana."

Andrew asked a follow-up question of Lunn. "Do I  understand from 
your answer that you're saying that  marijuana is an entry level 
drug. That it leads to  greater addictions?" he asked.

"Yes it does. It has the potential to do that. That's  what the 
experts have told me, police have also raised  that [concern]. It's a 
growing problem in our schools,  children are starting to use [drugs] 
at a much younger  age. I think we should be looking at programs to 
get  kids active in other things and steer them away from  drugs."

Andrew posed the same question to Jennifer Burgis.

"I think it is time to decriminalize the use of  marijuana. What 
really is a larger concern to us is the  kind of billion dollar 
economy and trade that is  underlying the trade in marijuana. If we 
can't get a  handle on where those dollars are and what kind of 
criminal trade they're driving - We need to define  better what is 
happening in the drug community. To  instantly link marijuana to 
crime in the drug trade is  a pretty wide consideration," Burgis answered.

"Are you then suggesting that the government should be  in some way 
collecting revenue from marijuana usage?"  Andrew asked Burgis.

"The government is trying to grow marijuana in a  mineshaft in 
Manitoba and isn't doing as good a job as  they do in British 
Columbia. So I think there is a  definite need to consider marijuana 
for medical usage  and to allow our young people and even some of our 
older people to travel back and forth in North America  without 
getting penalties for what they may have done  around a small piece 
of marijuana - I do condone the  government selling marijuana for 
medical purposes," she  answered.

"We know prohibition has never worked," said Lewis.  "The party 
position is that we should legalize the use  of marijuana. It should 
be a controlled substance like  tobacco and alcohol and it should be 
made available  through liquor stores, perhaps. And the result is we 
will be able to reduce gun crime, we will be able to  reduce gang 
violence, we would be able to reduce the  drug trade, we would be 
able to get rid of grow-ops and  we would use the profits for 
education and public  health initiatives."

"Are you saying that marijuana usage and growth is  directly related 
to the gun crimes in this province?"  Andrew asked.

"Absolutely, yes," Lewis answered.

"I think that it's being used for medicinal purposes  anyway. It is 
being grown for that aE" legally for  medicinal use," said Orr. "This 
is always a tough  question for me because I'm used to being with 
kids on  crystal meth aE" people try to link these drugs  together 
and really you shouldn't. The legalization of  marijuana would take a 
bunch of soft drugs and put it  off the market and it would take some 
of the crime off  the market. Now crime is actually on the hard drugs 
it's not on the marijuana. I'm going to be honest with  you, I find 
that a very tough question to answer.  Personally, I actually think 
it should be legalized. I  don't have a problem with that."

"I'm going to ask you the toughest one of the night,"  Andrew said to 
Orr. "Have you ever used marijuana?"

"I was a hippie, and you know what, I never used it aE"  I drank gin!"
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom