Pubdate: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 Source: Edmonton Journal (CN AB) Copyright: 2006 The Edmonton Journal Contact: http://www.canada.com/edmonton/edmontonjournal/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/134 Author: Karen Kleiss Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Note: Karen Kleiss is a Journal staff writer who smoked pot once, but did not inhale. CANADA'S SECOND FAILED PROHIBITION ATTEMPT Journalist Provides Thoughtful Contribution To Marijuana Debate, Plus Look Inside The Illegal Industry Bud Inc.: Inside Canada's Marijuana Industry by Ian Mulgrew Random House 304 pp., $35 Marijuana prohibitionists in Canada are facing an enemy more formidable and insidious than Cheech and Chong movies will ever be: simple economics. In his bulletproof book, Bud Inc.: Inside Canada's Marijuana Industry, Vancouver Sun reporter Ian Mulgrew examines how the widespread demand for cannabis sativa, combined with severely limited supply, has made the pot business among the most lucrative -- and guaranteed -- in Canada. In other words, the invisible hand is rolling a joint. The numbers are heady indeed. Citing research by Stephen Easton, an economics scholar with the right-wing Fraser Institute and a professor at Simon Fraser University, Mulgrew says the wholesale value of Canada's 2003 pot crop was about $5.7 billion. In British Columbia alone, the annual harvest value is almost equal to that province's mining and oil-and-gas sectors combined, and bigger than the entire agricultural sector. At retail street prices that weed is worth $19 billion. The book is resolutely anti-prohibition, and Mulgrew's most compelling argument details the similarities between current cannabis laws and alcohol prohibition in the early 1900s. Banning something many people want guarantees high prices and lots of profit for those willing break the law to provide it. In the cases of both alcohol and marijuana, prohibition doesn't reflect popular sentiment, so even law enforcement is half-hearted. And as with the Canadian distillery families who built empires shipping Canuck hooch south to the likes of Al Capone, the prohibitionist environment in Canada combined with the massive American market provides gangs with an easy, tax-free profit stream with which to support other ventures. In fact, at current prices a single indoor gardener with a small basement grow show can pocket the down payment for a house every three months. Such astounding black market profits and unprecedented demand mean stemming the supply would require massive police resources -- and the majority of Canadians aren't keen to spend millions jailing gardeners. Nevertheless, Mulgrew points out that prohibition means Canadian taxpayers bear the cost of busts, prosecution and abuse, but share none of the profits. He argues that if Canada legalizes and regulates marijuana sales -- as even the stodgy Senate has recommended -- lower law enforcement costs and new tax revenue would effectively transfer billions of dollars annually from black marketeers to the Canadian taxpayer, in addition to freeing up law enforcement resources to target legitimate crimes. Regulated sales would take unscrupulous dealers off the streets and provide safe, reliable medicine to seriously ill patients. The otherwise law-abiding toker would not bear the stigma of a criminal record for ingesting a substance far less dangerous than popular legal drugs like nicotine and alcohol. And as the retail hash bars of Amsterdam have already proven, actual usage of the drug would not increase nor would society crumble. But Bud Inc. is more than a thoughtful contribution to the prohibition debate; it is also an engrossing look inside the world of Canada's pot industry. Mulgrew profiles the major players in the battle to legalize pot and takes the reader behind the scenes and into the offices, head shops and grow-ops of prominent seed vendors, breeders and medicinal marijuana compassion clubs. His exotic tales of smuggling and underworld extravagance are fascinating, and Mulgrew's crisp first-person narrative style, along with the eloquence of his subjects, puncture the stereotypes of the thick stoner or ruthless drug thug. He shows the celebrities in Canada's cannabis culture are more likely to be thoughtful libertarian businessmen, obsessive horticultural scientists or committed palliative caregivers than the gangs who profit from prohibition. The book leaves readers painfully aware that Canada's second failed experiment with prohibition will continue, for now, to make no distinction between opportunistic gangs, cancer patients and Canadians unwinding at home. But it also lets them rest assured that market forces even under prohibition guarantee them a steady supply of primo bud -- which they will have to roll themselves. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman