Pubdate: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 Source: Seattle Times (WA) Copyright: 2006 The Seattle Times Company Contact: http://www.seattletimes.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/409 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) A STATE'S RIGHT TO ASSISTED SUICIDE By allowing Oregon's assisted-suicide law to stand, the U.S. Supreme Court says a person with a terminal illness may make a deeply personal decision about his or her life. We support such a law. The ruling would have been better, however, had it also helped define the constitutional limit of federal power. Oregon's law allows a doctor to prescribe a lethal dose of pain-killing drugs if certain conditions are met. First, the patient must want to die. Second, the doctor has to certify that the patient is sick, can't be cured and has fewer than six months to live. Third, a second doctor has to agree. Finally, the prescribing doctor cannot administer the drugs. The law affects only a tiny group. Under it, 37 patients were assisted in ending their lives in 2004. That is 10 in a million. We have heard no outcry against this from the people of Oregon, who voted for this measure twice. Clearly, this is a law they want. Former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft didn't want it. He declared that suicide is not a legitimate medical practice, and set federal power against the power of Oregon. The dispute went to the Supreme Court, under the name of the current attorney general, Alberto Gonzales. The 6-3 ruling in Gonzales v. Oregon is about how to interpret the Controlled Substances Act. It was not about the broader and more interesting question of whether assisted suicide is any of the federal government's business. Justice Antonin Scalia's dissent raised that issue and cast it aside, saying that if the federal government can ban marijuana, it can ban assisted suicide. We don't think assisted suicide should be a federal issue. We did not support the court's decision last year, in Gonzales v. Raich, that made a federal issue of California's law allowing doctors to prescribe marijuana to the chronically ill. That seemed the sort of question California could decide for itself. Tuesday's ruling would have been better had it stated that assisted suicide is a question Oregon could decide for itself. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom