Pubdate: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 Source: Knoxville News-Sentinel (TN) Copyright: 2006 The Knoxville News-Sentinel Co. Contact: http://www.knoxnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/226 Author: Bill Poovey, Associated Press Writer Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) PROSECUTOR TO APPEAL DISMISSAL OF METH CASES CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. - A prosecutor says the state will appeal a judge's decision to dismiss methamphetamine charges against 30 people after ruling that prosecutors misinterpreted a 1-year-old Tennessee law. David McGovern, an assistant district attorney general for the 12th Judicial District, said the Aug. 3 ruling by Circuit Judge Thomas W. Graham would be challenged. McGovern said the Tennessee attorney general's office was preparing the notice of appeal. The 2005 law restricts purchases of cold and allergy tablets that contain pseudoephedrine, a key ingredient in making the addictive stimulant, as well as other common products such as coffee filters or matches if they are knowingly purchased to make methamphetamine. State law limits purchases to no more than 9 grams of pseudoephedrine in any 30-day period and the judge said in his Thursday ruling that prosecutors could not use multiple purchases of pseudoephedrine to build their cases. The 30 defendants were charged after making multiple buys during a 30-day period that totaled more than 9 grams, records show. Thomas said it was "clear that since none of the purchases in these cases exceeded 9 grams, the state simply cannot legally make a promotion case as to any of these defendants." His decision said the law must be applied to a single purchase to withstand a constitutional challenge for vagueness. McGovern said prosecutors disagree and believe the law applies to the "aggregate amount. We think it reads a little broader." He said the appeal would be filed in the next few days. McGovern said if the appeals court reverses the judge, the cases would continue. Marion County investigators arrested more than 80 people in April on charges of promoting methamphetamine manufacture after collecting pharmacy records of pseudoephedrine transactions over a two-month period. The purchase records were compared to lists of people previously arrested for manufacturing methamphetamine. Phil Condra, a public defender, told Graham in a June hearing that the vagueness of the law puts innocent consumers in jeopardy because it allows law officers too much discretion in making arrests. He said it would allow arrests for buying other products used to make meth. Preston Shipp, an assistant Tennessee attorney general, said in a previous court filing that there was "no possibility of conviction of an innocent person who purchases, as the defendant suggests, two packages of coffee filters, with neither knowledge that it will be used to produce methamphetamine nor reckless disregard of its intended use." - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman