Pubdate: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 Source: Winnipeg Free Press (CN MB) Copyright: 2006 Winnipeg Free Press Contact: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/502 Author: Carol Sanders LAWYERS DISCUSS CROSS-BORDER CONFUSION A pardon probably doesn't count and an absolute discharge can mean absolutely nothing when you're trying to enter the U.S. with a criminal conviction, Winnipeg lawyers heard yesterday at a meeting of the Manitoba Bar Association. "We don't know what the U.S. authorities are going to do," said criminal lawyer Mike Law. One of the first things his clients ask is whether a conviction will prevent them from entering the States, he told a panel of immigration lawyers. In the "minefield" that is the U.S. immigration and border security system, that's never a simple question, said Law, who was looking to the panel on "cross-border confusion" for answers. But even experienced U.S. immigration lawyers are having a hard time navigating the system there, said Loan Huynh, chairman of the American Immigration Lawyer's Association Minnesota and Dakotas chapter. Regulations are constantly being revised and there is confusion about who has jurisdiction in different areas of immigration, said the lawyer with Fredrikson & Byron in Minnesota. Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 and the implementation of the U.S. Homeland Security Act, the American immigration department has been overhauled, split into new bureaucracies and riddled with new rules and departments, she said. Prior to 9/11, the U.S. immigration was already a puzzle for many Canadian judges, lawyers and their clients, said Law, who is with the firm Chapman Goddard & Kagan in Winnipeg. "There's a huge amount of confusion," said Law. He's heard judges grant absolute discharges for simple marijuana possession to spare someone from a conviction that would prevent them from getting into the U.S. when in fact the conviction stands in the eyes of the American authorities. Huynh said the U.S. doesn't recognize discharges. The conviction remains on the person's record when border agents check on the computer. The trouble is, Law said, most Canadians don't know that. There's confusing double standards as well. A Canadian convicted of drunk driving won't have as hard a time getting into the States as someone convicted of possessing a joint but the reverse is true for Americans trying to get into Canada, said Law. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake