Pubdate: Sat, 30 Sep 2006
Source: New Scientist (UK)
Pages: 40-45
Copyright: New Scientist, RBI Limited 2006
Contact:  http://www.newscientist.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/294
Author: Gaia Vince
Cited: DrugScope http://www.drugscope.org.uk
Cited: Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics http://www.cognitiveliberty.org
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hallucinogens.htm (Hallucinogens)

LEGAL HIGHS ON THE RISE

Lying back, exhaling: usually the last thing a person does before 
leaving this world. Only in this case it is the world that is leaving me.

A few minutes ago I smoked a pipe of Salvia divinorum, a powerful 
hallucinogenic herb that I bought openly and legally from a shop near 
my home. Of the UKP 25 I handed over, more than UKP 4 will find its 
way into government coffers in the form of sales tax. And salvia was 
just one of dozens of powerful but entirely legal psychoactive 
substances that I could have chosen.

All that was far from my mind as the salvia took me on a 
consciousness-expanding journey unlike any other I have ever 
experienced. My body felt disconnected from "me" and objects and 
people appeared cartoonish, surreal and marvellous. Then, as suddenly 
as it had began, it was over. The visions vanished and I was back in 
my bedroom. I spoke to my "sitter" - the friend who was watching over 
me, as recommended on the packaging - but my mouth was awkward and 
clumsy. When I attempted to stand my coordination was off. Within a 
couple of minutes, however, I was fine and clear-headed, though 
dripping with sweat. The whole experience had lasted less than 5 minutes.

My salvia trip was part of a journey into the world of "legal highs", 
a new generation of powerful mind-altering substances that are 
growing in popularity across the world. Accurate figures are hard to 
come by, as these substances are rarely monitored by drug-enforcement 
agencies. But the proliferation of online and high-street retailers 
suggest they are an increasingly lucrative business, and one company 
specialising in legal drugs recently reported an annual turnover of 
$16 million.

The reasons for their rising popularity are not hard to fathom. Not 
only are they legal and openly available in many countries, they 
work. Whether or not they are a good thing, however, is more 
difficult to decide. Supporters argue that legal highs are a bit of 
fun with a social conscience - a harm-reduction measure that allows 
people to experiment safely with psychoactive substances while 
separating drug use from criminality. Others say no one should be 
allowed to take such powerful drugs: the risks are too great. Some of 
the disagreement is down to the dearth of information about the short 
and long-term health effects of most of these substances, their 
potential for abuse and their addictiveness. But legal highs are also 
a battleground between those who see the use of mind-altering drugs 
as a human right and those who think it is plain wrong.

Faced with growing use and an information vacuum, governments are 
playing catch-up. Some, notably the US and Australia, are clamping 
down on each new substance as soon as they encounter it. Some are 
doing nothing. Others are commissioning research into the drugs and 
their effects before deciding what action to take.

And this is just the beginning. With hundreds of synthetic drugs on 
their way, not to mention traditional herbs that are being introduced 
to western consumers for the first time, some believe that cheap, 
easily available, legal highs could render the street drugs market 
redundant. So what do we know - and not know - about legal drugs?

Legal highs are nothing new. Paul Anand, manager of Shiva, the shop 
in Greenwich, London, where I bought my salvia, has been selling them 
for 15 years, starting with a stall at the Glastonbury festival. 
"Back then, I was selling guarana, damiana and wild lettuce," he 
says, "basically poor imitators of cannabis." There was a small 
market for the stuff, but among experienced drug users they were 
regarded as a joke, with few discernable effects.

That all changed with the arrival of new, reliable and effective 
substances, beginning in the UK at least with magic mushrooms. At the 
end of the 1990s, vendors started taking advantage of a legal 
loophole that permitted the sale of fresh mushrooms as long as they 
were not prepared in any way. Business boomed. In the year to April 
2004 the number of shops selling magic mushrooms in England and Wales 
rose from a handful to over 400, according to the British Crime 
Survey. In the same period 260,000 people bought mushrooms - an 
increase of 40 per cent on the previous 12 months.

In July 2005, the government closed the loophole, outlawing the sale 
of fresh mushrooms containing the hallucinogens psilocybin and 
psilocin, but by then it was too late. The demand for legal highs had 
been established, and high street and internet vendors rushed to fill 
the void with an assortment of alternatives. These include another 
type of magic mushroom, the fly agaric (Amanita muscaria), which does 
not contain psilocybin or psilocin but is packed with other 
hallucinogens including muscimol. Salvia is another. And then there 
is an astonishing assortment of psychoactive herbs, pills and potions 
designed to mimic the effect of pretty much every illegal drug going.

No Dodgy Dealers

Inside the shop, the cornucopia of offerings cannot be exaggerated. 
Vials and bottles crammed with herbal extracts, tinctures, seeds and 
powders jostle for attention with packets of "party pills". There are 
hallucinogens, relaxants, aphrodisiacs, trippy highs, "loved-up" 
pills and euphorics. All entirely legal, at least in the UK.

So why the sudden explosion? Anand says that his customers are 
attracted by the safety and quality of his products. "People are 
confident in what they're buying - that it's not cut with rat poison. 
They enjoy coming into the shop. They're not forced to meet a dodgy 
git in a UV-lit disco to buy an aspirin."

Vendors also make a selling point of legality. With drug testing 
increasingly routine at workplaces, 30 and 40-somethings are 
switching to highs that don't put them on the wrong side of the law, 
Anand says. And with legality comes, if not official approval, then 
at least an imprimatur of safety.

The majority of Anand's customers are aged between 20 and 30, he 
says. Most have tried street drugs and are now looking for something 
safer, more reliable, legal and affordable. And they're part of a 
growing movement: one leading vendor of legal highs, Stargate of 
Auckland, New Zealand, recently reported an annual turnover of NZ$24 
million (approximately US$16 million).

Among the most popular legal highs are "party pills" made from 
compounds called piperazines, which are chemically similar to Viagra 
but with an amphetamine-like action. Known by various brand names 
such as PEP and Bliss, their main active ingredient is BZP 
(benzylpiperazine) - the "Z" pronounced US-style to rhyme with the 
"B". Originally developed as a drug to treat parasites in livestock, 
piperazines have been sporadically used on the dance scene for many 
years but began to seriously take off about three years ago - though 
not in the US, where they have been strictly illegal since 2002. 
Anand started selling them in January 2006 and says that every month 
they grow more popular.

The BZP story started in the late 1990s, when the drug was 
"discovered" by New Zealand entrepreneur Matt Bowden. The former 
musician and recreational drug user became hooked on illegal 
amphetamines in the 1990s during an epidemic of methamphetamine - 
"crystal meth" - addiction that swept the country. He had already 
lost a family member to ecstasy when, in the mid-1990s, he witnessed 
a friend on meth commit a horrific suicide - disembowelling himself 
with a samurai sword - at a party.

Bowden became determined to kick the habit. His efforts to quit led 
him to experiment with legal alternatives and he sought out a 
professor of neuropharmacology to tutor him and work alongside him on 
the project.
"I said, let's find something which is like methamphetamine but 
non-addictive and has an extremely low risk of overdose or death," 
Bowden says. They searched through the scientific literature and came 
across a piperazine which occasionally cropped up as an ecstasy 
alternative called A2.

"We looked at a US study and found that one part of the molecule 
caused liver damage in rats, but the other part appeared to be 
perfectly safe. That part was BZP," he says.

In 2000, Bowden used the compound to break his addiction to 
methamphetamine and then began giving it out for free to friends. By 
2002, companies had begun making and selling BZP. The move led Bowden 
to set up his own company, Stargate, to market safe, legal 
alternatives to street drugs.

Stargate now produces and sells a range of pills based on piperazine 
blends. BZP is often combined with another piperazine, TFMPP 
(trifluorophenylmethylpiperazine), which gives the pills a relaxing, 
euphoric effect that has been compared to ecstasy.

Both drugs activate the 5HT serotonin receptor in the brain - the 
same receptor targeted by amphetamines and MDMA - and cause the 
release of dopamine (Neuropsychopharmacology, vol 30, p 550). This is 
responsible for the "high" associated with the pills, though it can 
also lead to anxiety, overheating and dehydration. In one survey, 
only half of people who had used BZP said they would describe its 
effects as "good"; 16 per cent said it was "good early but bad 
later", 10 per cent "bad" and 14 per cent "neither good nor bad". My 
own experience of using BZP was mixed, with some enjoyable effects 
but also a bout of paranoia, insomnia and a bad hangover the next day.

Worldwide, Bowden sells a million pills a year and, all told, New 
Zealand's legal party pills industry is worth around NZ$50 million a 
year. As these figures suggest, a lot of New Zealanders take BZP. In 
June, researchers at Massey University in Auckland released the 
results of a survey of more than 2000 people, commissioned by the New 
Zealand government. "We expected that no more than 5 per cent of 
those questioned would have tried BZP, but we actually found that 20 
per cent of people had tried the drug, and 1 in 7 of 15 to 
45-year-olds had used BZP in the past year," says study leader Chris Wilkins.

Wilkins says that the highest usage was by those in their 20s, as he 
had expected, but he also discovered high levels of use by people in 
their 30s and 40s.

A separate survey of around 1000 people carried out in Hamilton, New 
Zealand's seventh-largest city, yielded similar figures. It found 
that 12 per cent of the city's total population, and 30 per cent of 
14 to 25-year-olds, had taken BZP at some point (Emergency Medicine 
Australasia, vol 18, p 180).

The popularity of BZP, along with anecdotal reports of adverse 
reactions, withdrawal symptoms and psychotic episodes, has led some 
politicians and doctors to start campaigning for a ban. Bowden, 
however, argues that his products are "harmless fun" and actually 
reduce demand for street drugs and the damage they cause; the pills 
are even labelled as "drug-harm minimisation solutions". He and other 
vendors have an agreement to sell them only to adults and in outlets 
where alcohol is not available.

"If we accept that people have the right to experiment with their 
minds, just as they try paragliding or drag racing, then it is the 
responsibility of governments to ensure that they have access to 
well-designed drugs," Bowden says.

There is some evidence in support of Bowden's argument that BZP 
reduces the demand for street drugs. In the Hamilton survey, 44 per 
cent of the 15 to 45-year-olds who had tried BZP said they had 
stopped taking illegal drugs as a result. In 2005, the head of the 
New Plymouth Criminal Investigation Branch, Grant Coward, said that 
the use of ecstasy had dropped after BZP became available. It also 
appears that the relatively low price of BZP diverts people away from 
illegal drugs. An ecstasy pill in New Zealand costs up to NZ$80; the 
same amount will buy you up to 12 BZP tablets. "Most users said that 
they would rather take ecstasy than BZP because the effect is 
preferable and the hangover not as bad, but they're priced out of 
it," Wilkins says. What is not clear, however, is whether BZP acts as 
a gateway to illegal drugs among people who would otherwise never 
have taken them.

Wilkins also points out that the drug seems to have less abuse 
potential than amphetamines. "It gives you quite a bad hangover, so 
people tend to limit their usage of it," he says. Overall, however, 
Wilkins says it is too early to conclude that BZP reduces harm.

Health Worries

Worries are also emerging about the health effects of the drug. 
According to emergency doctor Paul Gee from Christchurch Hospital, 
BZP-related admissions were almost unheard of two years ago but are 
now commonplace. Between April and September 2005, his team dealt 
with 80 users complaining of nausea, vomiting, anxiety and 
palpitations. Some had seizures; two cases were life-threatening (The 
New Zealand Medical Journal, vol 118, p U1784). And while there have 
been no deaths directly attributed to BZP, in 2001 a woman died in 
Zurich after taking it with MDMA.

One of the biggest worries is that, because BZP is advertised as a 
"safer alternative", it fosters the belief that it is completely 
harmless and encourages people to take more than the recommended dose 
(about 200 milligrams). In the Hamilton survey, around a third of 14 
to 25-year-olds who had taken BZP said they did not read the 
instructions on the packaging. Nearly half took more than the 
recommended number of pills, and 66 per cent drank alcohol at the 
same time, which is not advisable as alcohol exacerbates the 
dehydrating effects of BZP.

The non-addictiveness and limited abuse potential of BZP have also 
been called into question with a study showing that rhesus monkeys 
will intravenously self-administer the drug at rates as high as they 
would for cocaine (Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol 77, p 161). 
What's more, work due to be published in the journal Neurotoxicology 
and Teratology shows that adolescent rats given BZP grow up into 
anxious adults.

With the doubts about BZP growing, it is no surprise that governments 
are sitting up and taking notice. In 2002 the US temporarily placed 
the drug on its schedule 1 rating, the same category as MDMA and 
heroin, and confirmed this in 2004. BZP has recently been made 
illegal in Japan, Denmark, Greece, Sweden and, as of 1 September, 
Australia. In the UK, BZP remains legal but is on the agenda for 
discussion at the government's advisory council on the misuse of 
drugs meeting on 2 November, where a decision will be taken as to 
whether BZP needs to be monitored further.

New Zealand, however, has taken a different and arguably more 
enlightened approach. In 2001 Bowden approached the government to ask 
for its help in regulating the new industry. In response the 
government introduced a new class of drug called "non-traditional 
designer substances", also known as class D. This class is a 
repository for new and little-researched drugs, such as BZP, pending 
further information. Class D drugs are legal, though there are some 
restrictions on them; in BZP's case that means a ban on sales to 
under-18s and in places that sell alcohol.

The government also commissioned three studies into BZP. One, the 
Hamilton prevalence study, has already been published. The other two 
concern the drug's health effects and are due out in November; 
Wilkins expects both to be critical. The outcome of these studies 
will heavily influence the legal status of BZP in New Zealand.

Whatever the fate of BZP, party pills won't be the last legal high to 
occupy government time. Thanks to the efforts of Bowden and 
like-minded individuals, new psychoactive substances - both natural 
and synthetic - continue to enter the market.

The next craze is likely to be for a legal high called kratom. This 
extract of a tree native to south-east Asia has been dubbed the 
"herbal speedball" for its euphoric and energising properties. 
Kratom's main active ingredient, mitragynine, binds to the same 
opiate receptor (mu) as opium, heroin and cocaine. There are no 
documented overdoses or fatalities and proponents claim it is 
non-addictive, although last year a team from Josai International 
University in Togane, Japan, published evidence to the contrary (Life 
Sciences, vol 78, p 2). It is legal almost everywhere except Thailand 
and Australia. In high doses it is supposed to produce hallucinogenic 
effects. However, when I tried it - boiling the leaves to make a 
nauseating tea - it merely made me sick and sleepy.

According to a US National Drug Intelligence Center report published 
in 2005, kratom is cheap and widely available in the US and has "high 
abuse potential", though up to now there have been no moves to ban 
it. That is sure to change. Arguably, drugs such as kratom are legal 
not because they have official approval but by default: they have yet 
to become popular enough to attract the attention of lawmakers. Once 
that happens - as with magic mushrooms in the UK - governments are 
quick to clamp down.

Another high that appears to be on the brink of losing its legal 
status is salvia. Also known as diviner's sage, "magic mint" or 
"Sally D", Salvia divinorum is a white-and-blue-flowered sage plant 
that grows in the Oaxaca mountains in Mexico. It has been used for 
centuries by the Mazatec people in shamanistic rituals and in healing.

The first westerner to experience salvia's powerful hallucinogenic 
effects was anthropologist Brett Blosser, now of Humboldt State 
University in Arcata, California. In the late 1980s, he was invited 
to take part in a Mazatec shamanic ceremony in which the participants 
rolled up salvia leaves and chewed them. The effect was profoundly 
psychedelic, Blosser reported.

Inspired by Blosser's account, Daniel Siebert, an independent 
ethnobotanist from Los Angeles, distilled the plant's juices to 
produce white, needle-shaped crystals which he called salvinorum A. 
Just a tiny crumb of this on his tongue produced what he describes as 
the most awesome and frightening experience of his life. "Suddenly I 
lost all physical awareness. I felt as though I were completely 
conscious and yet I had no body. I wondered if I had died," he says.

In 2002, with recreational use of salvia on the rise in the US and 
elsewhere, Bryan Roth, director of the National Institute of Mental 
Health's psychoactive drug screening programme at Case Western 
Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, took an interest. He 
discovered that salvinorum A is highly selective for the recently 
discovered kappa opioid receptor in the brain (Proceedings of the 
National Academy of Sciences, vol 99, p 11934). Like the other two 
opioid receptors (mu and delta), kappa is involved in pain 
sensations. But, unlike the other two, chemicals bound to it can 
cause hallucinations.

It's still unclear why salvia produces hallucinations. "Some of the 
experiences people have on salvia may be similar to the psychosis 
that occurs in late-stage Alzheimer's," says Roth. "There is an 
increase in the number of kappa receptors in the brains of people 
with late-stage Alzheimer's."

All studies so far have shown salvia to be non-addictive. It also 
appears to have limited potential for abuse. "Most people taking 
drugs are not looking for an out-of-body experience, they want 
something gentle," says Harry Shapiro from UK drugs information 
charity DrugScope. "Salvia is so strong that people try it once and 
never take it again."

Playing With Fire

Even so, possession of salvia has recently been made an offence in 
four US states - Louisiana, Missouri, Tennessee and Delaware - and a 
federal ban appears inevitable. Thomas Prisinzano of the University 
of Iowa in Iowa City, who is studying salvia to research new methods 
for treating substance abuse and pain, believes it is only a matter 
of time. "If LSD is schedule 1, then salvia will almost certainly be 
classed the same," he says.

Some researchers would welcome a ban on salvia and other new drugs. 
One of these is pharmacologist and substance misuse researcher 
Fabrizio Schifano of St George's Medical School in London. He says 
that the main problem with psychoactive substances - and 
hallucinogens in particular - is that they may incite psychosis. "How 
do you know if someone will have a sensitivity to the drug?" he says. 
"I am really worried by the prevalence of these drugs, and the fact 
that most users get their information from the internet. It is not 
peer-reviewed research, just people's opinions, and that is very dangerous."

Tim Kendall, deputy director of the Royal College of Psychiatrists 
research unit, says: "When you take salvia you are playing with fire. 
People can be very damaged in terms of their personal functioning. 
They frequently have flashbacks that intrude into their life, which 
can be almost like a post-traumatic stress problem after very bad experiences."

"My recommendation is that people should keep their minds clean," adds Roth.

Others believe that knee-jerk bans are the wrong approach. People 
have a natural drive to enter alternative states of mind, argues 
Richard Boire from the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics in 
Davis, California. "The role of governments is to prevent harm to 
people and society from dangerous drug use. I think the government 
has lost sight of this and now thinks its role is to stop people from 
entering other mindsets."

For governments intent on pursuing prohibition at all costs, there is 
a sobering thought. For every banned psychoactive substance there are 
dozens more that remain legal. The legendary pharmacologist Alexander 
Shulgin has synthesised more than 230 novel designer drugs, and 
according to psychologist John Halpern, associate director of alcohol 
and drug abuse research at Harvard University, there are dozens of 
legal hallucinogenic herbs besides salvia that are already widely 
available on the internet and growing in popularity (Life Sciences, 
vol 78, p 519). What is more, there is clearly a demand for the 
stuff, and plenty of people like Bowden willing to supply it. Salvia, 
BZP and kratom may be on the way out, but others will take their place. 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake