Pubdate: Fri, 3 Nov 2006
Source: DrugSense Weekly (DSW)
Website: http://www.drugsense.org/current.htm

LETTER OF THE WEEK

ANTI-POT LAWS DON'T WORK

By Neal Levine

The Nevada Appeal recently ran an editorial against Question 7, the 
marijuana initiative.  Unfortunately, the authors attributed many 
claims to our campaign that we have never actually made.

We have always been straightforward with our argument: Our marijuana 
laws don't work because anyone who wants to use marijuana can. In the 
meantime, the criminal market for marijuana is financing the 
activities of violent gangs and drug dealers.  The Appeal claims 
marijuana can be harmful, and we've never disputed that. But we do 
state that marijuana is safer than alcohol - a regulated substance 
that kills nearly 20,000 Americans every year by overdose - while no 
one has ever died of a marijuana overdose.

The editorial claimed more people would use marijuana if it were 
"more readily available." But marijuana is already widely available - 
how else would 100 million Americans have tried it?

The Appeal states that there is no war on marijuana, yet Nevada law 
enforcement spends $42 million every year in its attempt to enforce 
the failed policy of marijuana prohibition.

Finally, we agree with the Appeal on at least one thing: voters 
should use common sense when deciding how to vote on Question 7. 
Allowing marijuana to remain in the criminal market, where it 
finances the activities of violent gangs and drug dealers, doesn't 
make much sense for Nevada.  It's time for an alternative to the 
failures of marijuana prohibition.  If you favor passing a sensible 
marijuana policy for Nevada, vote yes on Question 7 on Nov. 7.

Neal Levine

Campaign manager, Yes on Question 7

Pubdate - Fri, 27 Oct 2006

Source - Nevada Appeal (Carson City, NV)

Referenced - http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n1385/a12.html
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake