Pubdate: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 Source: Gamecock, The (SC Edu) Copyright: 2006 The Board of Trustees of the University of South Carolina Contact: http://www.dailygamecock.com/home/lettertotheeditor/ Website: http://www.dailygamecock.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2319 Author: Joshua Rabon, Second-year accounting student Cited: Drug War Clock http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Marijuana) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) WHO GOT TRANS FAT IN MY WATER BONG? Legislation could bring new meaning to phrase 'rolling a fatty' in time Let's face it, banning trans fats extends government power much too far into the private sector for comfort and takes nanny state-ism to a new extreme. Give people the choice to be fat if they want - at least, that seems to be how many people on campus feel. But many of these pro-personal responsibility advocates don't speak out against anti-drug legislation, and that just doesn't make sense. Binging daily on trans fatty-loaded McDonald's fries is completely acceptable, but smoking marijuana in the privacy of your own home is not? "But drugs are so dangerous." Please. How many people died of heart disease last year compared to drug overdose? Drug-related violence, however, is absolutely a legitimate concern - that can be easily solved with legalizing drugs. Nicotine is highly addictive, but there aren't gun-slinging gang fights over cigarettes in gas station parking lots. By pro-viding regulated access to currently controlled substances, violence would actually be reduced. Aside from intentional violence, accidental drug-related issues would fall as well. No one would have to worry about their neighbor's meth lab exploding because the substance would be made by qualified individuals in a controlled lab. Anyone worried about someone over-indulging and losing their ability to make rational, intelligent decisions needs to walk down to Five Points one night, the later the better. The addictive nature of drugs seems to be one area that clearly separates the two, but studies have shown eating can be addictive as well, and don't forget about 100 percent legal tobacco (Source: Brookhaven National Laboratory). According to http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm, over $47 billion has been spent fighting drugs this year. Harvest Hope Food Bank serves over 149,000 people every year. People around this country are hungry, homeless and without proper medical care, and people want to freak out over drugs. Sounds like we spent that $47 billion wisely. I'm not advocating picking up recreational drug use at all; in fact, I discourage it. If drugs were to be legalized, I wouldn't want to see people lined up outside stores waiting for their fix PlayStation 3-style. But it all comes back to personal responsibility. If you think people shouldn't be told what they can and can't put into their bodies, it's time to stop letting propaganda and the past make decisions for you. It's time to stop wasting countless dollars and let people take care of themselves. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake