Pubdate: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 Source: Salt Lake City Weekly (UT) Section: Private Eye Copyright: 2006 Copperfield Publishing Contact: http://www.slweekly.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/382 Author: John Saltas WARS "R" US The number of Americans killed while fighting in the Middle East has now topped the number of Americans killed in the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. We're fast approaching 3,000 killed in Iraq. In her weekly column, Ann Coulter recently wrote that if we stayed in Iraq 10 years and lost another 3,000, that would be an acceptable loss if we don't have another terrorist attack on American soil. I disagree. Not just because I think she has the worst legs in America (which would have been unleashed at Abu Ghraib if not in direct violation of the Geneva Accords), but also because I think that Ann (at this point, if I were Ann, I'd insert something like, "Ann, which is short for Hassann"--she does that all the time when referring to Democrats and thinks it's funny) epitomizes the face of false and deceptive bravado that is a hallmark of the far right of American politics. What we are fighting in the Middle East has been broadly called the War on Terror, a name that not even Donald Rumsfeld approved of. By casting that war in the same generality as the War on Drugs, the War on Poverty or the War on Crime (all begun in my lifetime and all still being "fought"), its easy to keep promoting it because, after all, who isn't against drugs, poverty, crime or terror? Foolish people listen to the likes of Ann (Hassann) Coulter, reveling in her caustic bombardment of any American who finds cause to pause and consider that the war in Iraq is not worth fighting, even if she says so. What is worth it to Ann is not worth it to me. Especially not in the manner that the war has been sold, promoted and fought by the Bush administration. As far as I'm concerned, the first American soldier to die in Iraq was unjustified, let alone the next 2,999. Like most of you, after 9/11, I was all for going after the bad guys, which we were told were in Afghanistan. I don't need to go through the litany of events that took us into Iraq, but I never supported that war for even a moment. That it has gone poorly is not even a mild understatement. The unfortunate consequence of the Bush team screwing up so badly is that our leaving might make matters worse. Then, let them be worse. For what could be worse than this: In the past few years, Americans have watched the chiseling away of one freedom after another. We are not so free as we think, we Americans. Nor are we so safe. Here's a revelatory tidbit, again from a conservative right-winger, Pat Buchanan, long an outspoken and frequent critic of the Bush administration and of the war in Iraq. He now thinks we can't leave because it would make matters worse in the Middle East. Arianna Huffington deliciously nailed him by calling him the anti-Kerry--he was against the war before he was for it. But, before he was for the war he was against, Pat passed along a sorry note that evaded nearly all Americans. He wrote a few months ago--to the eyes of a few, apparently--that while everyone is wringing their hands over the number of soldiers killed fighting terror, that over 85,000 Americans had been murdered since 9/11. After the Vietnam War, we built a wall to commemorate the 58,000 soldiers killed there in about 17 years. At that pace, a similar wall for American murder victims would bear the names of over a quarter million people, the equivalent of over 90 WTC attacks, the same fearful attacks scary Ann thinks are coming if we depart Iraq. If you watch Fox News, you likely only heard of the Holloway disappearance or the Ramsey murder, but there it is on the FBI Website for all to see--we average over 16,000 murders a year in the United States. Believe it or not, that's down about 30 percent from a decade ago. So, how come there's no clamor about that? Ya got me! All I know is that in these twisted times, I once wrote that there are more murders annually in Salt Lake County than in all of Greece and that someone--I presume a Fox News nitwit--wrote back to me that if I loved Greece, so much I should move my ass out of Utah. It was only a comparative line, not a renouncement of my citizenship, but that was the reply. We are not really serious about fighting the War on Crime, let alone the war in Iraq. Such wars are not for fighting, really, not even about winning. They're about sustaining. They're about picking sides and alignments and they're about getting out of the way and sending someone else do the real fighting. The War on Crime is working as long as no crime is committed against you. The poor are not so poor when you give a buck at Christmas, are they? And heck, since you quit smoking pot 20 years ago, the War on Drugs is going well, too. We are fighting and winning so many wars all at once, it's small wonder people like nasty Ann cite such as evidence America is the greatest country in the history of man. Which is really the rub. Advocates for an even better America are belittled as weak-willed America haters. A brilliant tactic, really. We can't stop fighting in Iraq, for if we do, the terrorists will have won--so it goes. Somewhere out there, an armed, American drug lord is smiling, knowing al-Qaeda has nothing to worry about. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D