Pubdate: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 Source: Daily Free Press (Boston U, MA Edu) Copyright: 2006 Back Bay Publishing, Inc. Contact: http://www.dailyfreepress.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/796 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hea.htm (Higher Education Act) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?219 (Students for Sensible Drug Policy) STOPPING DRUGS - AND STUDENTS "Promoting educational excellence for all Americans." This is the motto of the U.S. Department of Education, displayed prominently under the department's masthead on its homepage. Yet for the past eight years it's been clear that the federal government only promotes educational excellence for some Americans. In 1998, Congress added a new provision to the Higher Education Act. The so-called Drug Provision prevents students with past drug convictions from receiving federal financial aid, without which it's virtually impossible for millions of students nationwide to attend college. It would be nice if the war on drugs was a black and white affair -- if we could say that anyone who's ever done drugs is bad, and everyone else is good -- but it's much more complex than that. Many children in low-income neighborhoods have no choice about growing up in drug-riddled environments, where smoking pot or shooting heroin is just a way of life. College is a way out of this culture of drugs, an announcement to the world that one seeks more out of life than what's offered in the slums. Why, then, do we target those so obviously seeking to turn their lives around, those who need college more than anybody? We should be encouraging these students to attend college, not erecting obstacles in their way. People who have done their time for drugs have, simply, done their time, and should be able to move on. The HEA's Drug Provision prevents many from doing this by establishing a sort of double jeopardy for those with a drug record. Of course, there will always be exceptions. A handful of students will continue their drug habits once they get to college, and these students may end up wasting their financial aid money by dropping out of school. But if one drug offender seems especially likely to be a problem in college, he or she should be evaluated on an individual basis; the vast majority of would-be college students intending to turn their lives around don't deserve to be automatically punished for a wrong decision they may have made five or ten years ago. Anyone who has applied to college and applied for financial aid through the FAFSA knows that these are not easy processes. If people show a willingness to put the time and effort into pursuing higher education, they should be commended, not condemned. According to Students for Sensible Drug Policy, which opposes the HEA's Drug Provision, more than 175,000 people have had their aid stripped since 2000. Congress should repeal the provision before any more students are denied the chance to improve their prospects for a better life. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman