Pubdate: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 Source: North Shore News (CN BC) Copyright: 2006 North Shore News Contact: http://www.nsnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/311 Author: James Weldon Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) NEW HYDRO LAW ON GROW OPS DEBATED A newly proposed law aimed at locating marijuana grow operations could be a valuable weapon in the battle to drive them from the North Shore, say authorities, but the proposed rule change is also raising hackles among privacy advocates. If passed Bill 25, The Safety Standards Amendment Act, introduced in the provincial legislature Thursday, will grant municipalities the right to access electricity records of BC Hydro customers without going through the judicial system. Under the proposed law, local governments could then pass on any of that information to their police force for further investigation. The law is meant to make it easier for police to spot grow ops, which typically devour power at a high rate, but the move has civil liberties advocates fuming. "Anything I do in my home is my business. It's nobody else's unless the state has a compelling interest and justification for accessing my information," said Murray Mollard, executive director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Union. At the moment, police must demonstrate reasonable grounds for suspicion and then obtain a search warrant to access the personal records of a hydro customer. "This provision actually provides a back door for undermining that," said Mollard. The proposed law is part of a larger pattern of legal erosion of privacy in Canada, he added. "We see a push by government generally to collect more and more information about its citizens," said Mollard, pointing to efforts at the federal level to make it easier to access phone records. But police officials aren't buying that argument. For them, the new rules would do far more to protect residents than to harm them. "The safety of the community outweighs any concerns that individuals might express about hydro consumption being disclosed to the police or fire agencies," said Sgt. Paul Skelton, spokesman for the West Vancouver Police Department. The hazards of illegal cultivation are well known, he said, as illustrated by the explosion at a British Properties grow operation earlier this week. That sentiment was echoed by firefighters. "From a fire department standpoint our number 1 priority is life safety," said Victor Penman, assistant fire chief for the District of North Vancouver Fire Rescue Services. Penman was careful to note that he had not yet looked closely at the proposed legislation, but he agreed with the plan in principle. Grow ops are a major concern not only for residents, but for emergency personnel as well, said Penman. The illegal operations can contain any number of hazards from illegal wiring and propane hookups to booby traps and even armed occupants. "As the number of these operations increases in the community, the likelihood grows that first responders and the general public will unknowingly walk into a life-threatening situation." Knowing that a given residence has suspiciously high power consumption would give responders a heads up, and reduce the chances of injury, he said. Mollard, however, rejects the argument for safety, saying that grow operators will adapt in a way that might actually increase danger. "It's going to encourage whoever's doing this to bypass the electrical system ... or to look at alternative power sources," he said, suggesting some might turn to propane instead - something that utility bills would not reveal. "That's a very dangerous source of energy and you're going to see more of that." That claim does not convince Skelton, however. "Every time laws come into place criminals always alter their means to circumvent laws and get around them," he said. "If we sit back idly and don't do anything, it's going to be business as usual for them." No one is claiming it will be the ultimate solution, added Skelton. "It's just another tool," he said. "I don't think by any stretch of the imagination it's going to be the last piece of legislation we're going to see . . . to deal with this growing epidemic," he said. Either way, the bill is not yet law, and will likely be the subject of further debate before it is passed. "From our point of view, the legislation is somewhat constitutionally suspect from the get go," said Mollard. "I can imagine this legislation being challenged at some point in court." - --- MAP posted-by: Jackl