Pubdate: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 Source: Kitchener-Waterloo Record (CN ON) Copyright: 2006 Kitchener-Waterloo Record Contact: http://www.therecord.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/225 Author: Dianne Wood Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/af.htm (Asset Forfeiture) CROWN DRUG SEIZURES CALLED UNFAIR Farmers who plant seeds don't always produce a bumper crop, and the same can be said for marijuana growers. That will be one of the arguments advanced by defence lawyers this week at a hearing where the federal government is trying to seize four Kitchener homes used to grow pot in 2004. A federal prosecutor is applying for forfeiture of homes used by five family members to grow 593 marijuana plants. The prosecution considers the operation a sophisticated one and believes forfeiture of the homes, plus jail sentences, are needed to denounce the crime. But lawyers will argue this was not a major operation deserving of such heavy punishment. A couple and three children still live in one of the homes at 4 Wyandotte Crt. Lawyers say forfeiting the homes would be disproportionate to the crime. "If they never made any money growing marijuana, and you're asking them to give up hundreds of thousands of dollars, that would be cruel," Craig Parry, the lawyer for one of the accused said outside Kitchener's Ontario Court yesterday. He produced photographs of some of the seized pot plants, scoffing at police suggestions that some of the spindly plants would be worth $1,000 on the street. That would make the whole pot operation worth over half a million dollars. But some of the plants didn't grow well and wouldn't have produced much of anything, Parry will argue. "They're not great farmers," he said."Ask any farmer who never had any training how he did in his first year of business. "There seems to be a blind faith that if you plant a seed, you'll get a yield. That's junk science." Defence lawyers will challenge the government's method of estimating the yield and value of the plants. To do so, they'll call a Kitchener man who's been convicted three times of growing marijuana. Les Soloman now has a government licence to grow it legally for medical purposes. Because he's been growing pot since the early 1980s, lawyers will try to have him accepted as an expert witness on growing marijuana. "He's got some experience in the field," Parry said. Federal prosecutor Mike O'Malley wouldn't discuss the government's case yesterday. But a year ago, a local federal prosecutor, Kathleen Nolan, gave notice that the government would regularly try to seize homes used in pot grows to reduce the profit for greedy drug operators. The five people have already pleaded guilty to charges related to growing marijuana at the homes. Their sentencing will take place after Justice Gary Hearn rules on the forfeiture issue. Their lawyers all agreed yesterday that some forfeiture was required, but not all four homes. They concede the homes are offence-related property. By agreeing to partial forfeiture, they hope to reduce the sentences to conditional sentences of house arrest, and avoid jail terms. Each home had equity of about $70,000. The homes are at 4 Wyandotte Crt., 2 Corfield Dr., 117 Oneida Pl. and 3121 Briarfield St. The pot operations were in the basements. The Oneida Place home was sold and the government wants the cash forfeited. Lawyer Brennan Smart, who represents Chien Khac Nguyen, the owner of the Wyandotte Court home, said outside court that if his client loses that home, his family and their three children will have to find another place to live. But that's preferable to going to jail, he said. Changes to the Criminal Code and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act allow seizures of homes if they have been used in a marijuana operation and if seizing them would be proportional to the crime. Today, the prosecution is expected to put its expert on the stand, a Waterloo regional police officer who will testify about the dangers of marijuana grow operations, and explain how police come up with expected yields and value of the plants. Also convicted are Cuong Khac Nguyen and his wife, Huyen Le Thi Vu, and Que Kim Thi Nguyen, who is the wife of Chien Khac Nguyen. Nam Thi Dinh, the mother of Cuong Khac Nguyen and Que Kim Thi Nguyen is also charged. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom