Pubdate: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 Source: Scotland On Sunday (UK) Copyright: 2006 The Scotsman Publications Ltd. Contact: http://www.scotlandonsunday.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/405 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/heroin.htm (Heroin) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?136 (Methadone) BUSTED STRATEGY OF THE WAR ON DRUGS THE admission that the war on drugs in Scotland has already been lost, made in these pages today by the man at the head of the battle, is to a large extent a statement of the obvious. Who could legitimately argue otherwise when 50,000 Scots are addicted to drugs, mostly heroin, or when it was disclosed last week that an eight-year-old was among 548 Scottish children who were treated for addiction last year? It was, nonetheless, brave of Tom Wood to become the first significant figure to come out and state what so many others quietly believe - however clear we are that drugs are a scourge on our society, they are never going to go away. The chair of the Scottish Association of Alcohol and Drug Action Teams, and a senior policeman with decades of experience at the sharp end, Wood has to be taken seriously when he says that the 'Just Say No' tactic will not work in a country where 5% of 12-year-olds have experimented with drugs. Inevitably, in speaking out, Wood threw himself into another drugs war - - the ongoing wrangle between those who pursue an absolutist agenda and those who favour harm reduction. Graeme Pearson, director of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency, said he "fundamentally disagreed" with Wood, while Alistair Ramsay, former director of Scotland Against Drugs, insisted there should be even more emphasis on enforcement to tackle the menace. The failure of the anti-drugs industry, which has blossomed over the past 10 years in Scotland, has been its inability to marry this hardline viewpoint with the equally clear need to offer a pragmatic approach to rehabilitation and care for those already suffering from drug abuse. Too often, the harm reduction lobby has fought with the drug prevention groups in an unseemly turf war, squabbling over who gets the most government cash. All the while, the number of drug-related deaths has risen by 30% since the mid-1990s, at a time when it is falling across the rest of the UK. On this occasion, Wood is largely, if depressingly, correct. We do need to get real about drugs and target resources better. As with so many of Scotland's social ills, drug misuse largely hurts the poorest the hardest. Problematic drug use varies from 2.9 people per 1,000 in Orkney, to 30.8 people per 1,000 in Glasgow. Over the past decade, there was an average of 460 hospital admissions per 100,000 people in Glasgow, compared with a mere 20 per 100,000 in the most affluent areas. If this government is genuinely serious about tackling the drug abuse, then it needs to bring an end to the ghetto-isation of Scotland's poor through stimulating the kind of opportunity culture which provides the only real antidote to drugs. The other main target must be the young. Great strides have been made in the way we educate children about the risks attached to taking drugs. As Wood stresses, the only way the message will be taken seriously by teenagers is if they are treated seriously and given the information they need to make up their own minds. We can only hope they then make the right decision. Educating younger children - such as the seven-year-old who collapsed in class after taking methadone - is more problematic, but all the evidence suggests that, despite the problems associated with introducing them to drugs through education, it is preferable to letting them discover these particular facts of life through ill-informed playground chat or even at the hands of the local drug dealer. But we cannot entirely back Wood. There is a danger that his words will be seen as the forces of law and order giving in to those who profit from the misery of addiction. In part, we define our society by declaring those things we simply will not condone, no matter how popular they may be with a minority of people. Therefore, while the war on drugs may not be winnable - and perhaps, as Wood believes, may already be lost - we must continue to fight it with every means at our disposal. And we must never declare a surrender. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake