Pubdate: Thu, 22 Jun 2006
Source: Gay City News (NY)
Section: Volume 5, Number 25 | June 22 - 28, 2006
Copyright: 2006 Gay City News
Contact:  http://www.gaycitynews.com
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/3651
Author: Nathan Riley
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/heroin.htm (Heroin)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?137 (Needle Exchange)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?140 (Rockefeller Drug Laws)

A CRUSADING DA AND DRUG REFORM

Perspective/ Harm Reduction

Rather than focus on the whipping that Congressional Democrats took 
on the pro-war resolution in Washington, let us go instead upstate to 
Albany and look at a Democrat who fought back when set upon by the 
right-wing attack dogs.

David Soares, the Albany district attorney, attracted attention when 
he became the first law enforcement official in decades to win an 
election by charging that his opponent was too tough on crime. He ran 
against the Rockefeller drug laws. The incumbent, an old-line Albany 
Democrat, Paul Clyne, had a reputation as a tough DA. But he lost in 
the primary to a coalition of blacks, gays, reformers, and the 
Working Families Party. At 35, Soares, a former junior member of the 
DA's office, was given no chance of winning, but he carried the 
primary with a whooping 62 percent of the vote.

Since he was elected in 2004, he's had run-ins with the police over 
investigations of excessive force and raised anxiety levels when he 
started an official corruption unit, but these brouhahas were minor 
compared to the one that started after his a speech at a harm 
reduction conference in Vancouver, British Columbia. Harm reduction 
is the name for the public health approach to drug control. It's most 
famous programs in New York City are needle exchanges which increase 
the supply of sterile needles and reduced needle sharing to stanch 
the spread of the AIDS virus.

Harm reduction is a general rubric that describes a multitude of 
approaches to drug use and abuse and the spread of disease. Cleans 
needle exchanges and over-the-counter sale of sterile needles give 
injection drug users access to safe equipment. Club drugs and dancing 
lead to dehydration and heat stroke, and in response some European 
countries require that nightclubs have an ample and free supply of 
water. Drug overdose deaths are preventable if treated promptly, so 
in Australian cities needle injectors are taught to identify the 
signs of an overdose and often given a medicine that restores normal 
breathing. Drug users and ambulance drivers met in an effort to 
encourage needle users and their friends to promptly call 911.

In the United States, where harm reduction is often ridiculed and 
even condemned as encouraging, in various contexts, illegal behavior 
and risky sex, a potent new combination of heroin has led to hundreds 
of deaths. Conferences like the one in Vancouver are invaluable to 
policymakers because there they have a chance to learn about 
innovations in public health and drug control policy.

By going to Vancouver, Soares was keeping a campaign promise. The 
International Conference on the Reduction of Drug Related Harm is 
held every two years, and brings together academics, activists, and 
government officials from all over the world. There Soares met 
government officials and experts who told him how polices worked in 
practice as opposed to the way they are caricatured by critics. The 
conference in turn honored Soares by having him address a plenary session.

The speech unleashed the wrath of the right wing. Playing on the 
similarity of the last names of Soares and George Soros, the wealthy 
investor who is the biggest contributor to drug reform causes and a 
strident crusader against President George W. Bush, the New York Post 
went on the offensive with its May 4 headline: $OROS' D.A. DRUG 
OUTRAGE--UPSTATER RIPS U.S. POLICY AS A RACKET.

Soares' speech included a commonplace assertion among drug 
reformers--that the drug war continues "because it provides law 
enforcement officials with lucrative jobs." The Post wouldn't let go 
of that statement and the Albany County sheriff and the city's mayor 
and police chief reacted in fury. Sheriff James Campbell said, "All 
the police agencies work together. It's not I, it's we," and asked if 
Soares thought "the law enforcement agencies weren't going to respond 
to his statements?"

Soares wisely chose not to fight over the issue of "lucrative jobs," 
and quickly apologized for that statement. But this isn't the tale of 
a wimp, but of a fighter. Soares didn't go away, he had a point to 
make, and he was not going to let the focus fall on the apology.

Instead, he slammed home his most basic point--Albany can't stop drug 
abuse by arresting people with $20 bags of dope. And then he re-upped 
the ante by charging, "We are dealing with people whose hate for me 
is vicious. And I will not let them drive me out." And he turned a 
hearing where he was supposed to be censured into a pep rally, filled 
with banner-wielding citizens and politicians who back his call for 
the end of Rockefeller drugs laws.

On TV, the battle clearly pitted those aiming to end draconian drug 
laws against opponents of reform. Soares won the war of the message.

In a telephone interview, the DA exuded a sense of calm. The dust-up 
exposed the weakness of the opposition to reform--their numbers aren't growing.

"My critics in Albany County are the same critics who were there when 
I announced my candidacy," he said. "They have stayed in the 
background and have worked hard to thwart my reforms."

"It's the same drill, in essence, that plays out any time a public 
official or public figure is candid enough [to make] his or her 
critics uncomfortable," concluded the Times Union, in writing that 
Soares had the better of the debate's substance. "The opposition 
jumps on a few select words and, perhaps, some of the more inelegant 
or less politically nuanced phrases."

Soares' opponents failed, in the view of the Times Union, because 
they can't satisfactorily answer the bottom line question: How have 
"draconian laws" stopped drug abuse? The primary result of get-tough 
policies has been the "disproportionate" imposition of "excessively 
long prison sentences" on blacks and Latinos. Drug abuse and "all the 
problems that come with it" continue to fester.

By fighting back, this reformer flummoxed those on the attack who 
often bedevil Democrats. The failure to fight too often leaves 
Democrats, on the full panoply of issues, isolated and alienated from 
the public--which is almost the very prescription for permanent 
minority party status. Soares came out of his battle with renewed 
self-confidence and vigor and is an example to be emulated.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman