Pubdate: Sat, 17 Feb 2007
Source: New Zealand Herald (New Zealand)
Copyright: 2007 New Zealand Herald
Contact:  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/300
Author: Paul Thomas
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth)

OBSESSION WITH PAST HIDES PRESENT ISSUES

Bill Clinton famously claimed that he tried marijuana once but "did 
not inhale". Amazingly enough this wasn't necessarily Slick Willie's 
most preposterous public statement. Years later he would stare into 
the camera and intone, "I did not have sex with that woman" when even 
a Mongolian goatherd knew otherwise.

(Apparently he was invoking some entirely private distinction between 
oral sex and the real thing.)

Later still he stonewalled a grand jury with: "It depends on what the 
meaning of the word 'is' is."

The lesson of Clinton's career and enduring popularity would seem to 
be that if the public finds a politician attractive and decides he 
can be trusted not to steer the ship of state into the proverbial 
iceberg, they're not too bothered by whatever low-rent grubbiness he 
gets up to in his down-time.

That in turn suggests they care even less about the sins of his hot 
and foolish youth.

However, at this point the pundits are reserving judgment on what 
impact the revelations of David Cameron's and Barack Obama's teenage 
drug-taking will have on their electoral prospects.

Cameron is the leader of the British Conservative Party and, unlike 
his hapless three immediate predecessors, someone the British public 
might just regard as Prime Minister material.

At Eton he got a severe wigging from the headmaster for smoking 
marijuana, but the experience wasn't sufficiently salutary to stop 
him further indulging while at Oxford University, coincidentally the 
setting for Clinton's mythical feat of self-denial.

Obama, the junior senator from Illinois who this week confirmed that 
he's running for president, has admitted using marijuana and cocaine 
when he was at high school and in the grip of an identity crisis.

As usual there's more to both furores than was immediately apparent.

Obama actually 'fessed up 11 years ago when an astute publisher 
decided there was a market for the autobiography of the first black 
person to be elected editor of the Harvard Law Review.

Dreams From My Father details his unusual background - Kenyan father 
who returned to Africa when Obama was 2; white Kansan mother; brought 
up, largely by his grandparents, in Hawaii - and his struggle to come 
to terms with his mixed ethnicity.

Obama's candour has been applauded but it remains to be seen if this 
baggage becomes a burden when the campaign gets nasty, as it assuredly will.

The buzz around Cameron is heightened by the fact that he's a toff. 
This week the Independent dwelt on his membership, while at Oxford, 
of the Bullingdon Club, an exclusive clique under whose aegis 
blue-blooded undergrads have engaged in binge drinking and vandalism 
for 150 years.

While the story might have helped Cameron secure the football 
hooligan vote, its real subject is his social class rather than a 
youthful predilection for getting blotto and heaving pot-plants 
through restaurant windows.

The implied question was: do we really want this upper-class twit to 
be our next Prime Minister?

For those of us who don't share the English obsession with class, the 
question is: why do we care what politicians did before they became 
politicians?

We don't in relation to judges, school teachers or airline pilots, to 
take three professions in which it's arguably more relevant.

Oddly enough this view that our political leaders should have avoided 
the pitfalls of youth co-exists with the widespread assumption that 
they're all dishonest, inept, parasitic sleazebags whose real 
motivation for entering public life is to feather their own nests. 
Censoriousness and cynicism make uneasy and illogical bedfellows.

As usual too, the focus on backgrounds and peccadilloes obscures the 
real issues. Dabbling in drugs didn't distract these two from their 
studies or slow their meteoric rises. In fact, that sense of having 
risen without trace is the real question mark hanging over this pair, 
both of whom so far seem more about style than substance.

Cameron had been in Parliament for only four years before becoming 
leader of a party persuaded by successive electoral calamities that 
the essential attribute of a would-be Prime Minister is that he 
shouldn't remind people of their dorkiest uncle. A similar notion 
seems to have precipitated National's recent change of leadership.

Obama has been a senator for two years. His inexperience may not 
matter, for just as "presentation" skills increasingly outweigh 
achievement in the appointment process, presidential elections are 
usually won by the best campaigner as opposed to the best candidate.

And while editorial writers agonise over whether the US is ready for 
a black president, the anti-PC brigade senses a conspiracy unfolding: 
if Obama was white, they bleat, his candidacy wouldn't be taken seriously.

Looking at the extremely mixed bag of Caucasians who've occupied the 
White House or got within a heartbeat of the presidency (Dan Quayle, 
to take one admittedly striking example), one wonders how they manage 
to keep a straight face.