Pubdate: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 Source: Parksville Qualicum Beach News (CN BC) Copyright: 2007 Parksville Qualicum Beach News Contact: http://www.pqbnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1361 Author: Fred Davies GRAVELY ILL The Law Is An Ass. Or at least the ones that impose criminal sanctions for using or providing marijuana to ease symptoms of illness and disease are. That's what 93 per cent of Canadians seem to suggest when they say, as they did in a 2006 Maclean's Magazine poll, that they support the legal use of marijuana for medical purposes. Yes, it's true that roughly 1,000 people in this country have received an exemption that, in abidance with a number of restrictions, allows them to puff or otherwise administer a daily dosage of THC while still maintaining their law abiding citizen status. The respondents to the poll who so clearly see the wisdom of letting medical patients -- in many cases gravely ill with dehabilitating disease -- have access to a natural, non-addictive, source of relief with minimized side effects is clear. They probably believe marijuana is relatively easily to acquire for someone who, for example, has AIDS and turns to weed for its ability to fight nausea or bolster the appetite. But they'd be wrong. Health Canada makes it anything but easy to use what may just be the best and only remedy for hundreds of thousands. That's why compassion clubs exist but they do so under shadowy legal circumstance and without the implicit approval of the state: witness the recent bust of the Mid-Island Compassion Club. It serves no useful purpose to blame the police for doing their job. As the saying goes, cops don't make 'em, they only enforce them. But the ignorance and waste does bring to mind a question: Why have laws against drug use at all? Rather than tie ourselves up in knots deciding what is and isn't a legitimate use for weed, or indeed any of the so called recreational drugs, why not consider abolishing the laws against all of them? It's not as preposterous as it sounds. Hopefully it's needless to point out the hypocrisy of a society that will throw one in jail for harvesting a plant with a long history of rich and varied use quite aside from its intoxicating properties; while at the same time blithely ignoring, even encouraging, the rampant abuse of alcohol. Besides, there is but one acceptable reason to criminalize drugs and that is deterrence. On that score the laws not only aren't working, they're getting in the way. Unless we condone handing out life sentences or worse to those who grow or distribute marijuana, the market will continue to supply the considerable demand for a substance that provokes little by way of social disintegration outside of the odd carelessly discarded candy wrapper. Sure the gangs money and greed create violence and mayhem but that occurs in relation to the fact it's illegal. As for the rest, (heroin, cocaine, ecstasy etc.) is it truly our belief that, given the opportunity, vast additional numbers will turn to cranking or snorting dangerous psychotropic drugs simply because there's no law against it? More to the point, why is it anybody's business in the first place? If society is so sure that any altering of the mindset is inherently destructive what's with the burgeoning prescription market for drugs-aimed at treating a host of mental illnesses-that do exactly that? The only ones who benefit from an all out assault on drugs are the lawyers, police, jail guards and other employees tasked with warehousing and stigmatizing any and all who choose to use. All of it wasting money that would be better spent on education, social programs and rehabilitation that might actually reduce use and mitigate the damage-much of which is caused by the legal sanctions that place so many in precarious and unpredictable situations in the first place. Like prostitution, drugs and their attendant social ills are a problem that's not about to go away. The odd forward thinking initiative like Vancouver's safe injection site have proven to be successful in reducing social harm. Pointed fingers, pious misguided moralizing and a refusal to accept that drug abuse is a health problem much more than a criminal issue does less than nothing to discourage the use of drugs or protect us from its consequences. - --- MAP posted-by: Elaine