Pubdate: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 Source: Cumberland Times-News (MD) Copyright: 2006 Cumberland Times-News Contact: http://www.times-news.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1365 Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v06/n000/a447.html Author: Dave Crockett GROUP ERRS IN TYING ANTI-DRUG EFFORT SOLELY TO LAW ENFORCEMENT To the Editor: The issues addressed by Melanie Michael - Neighborhood group says courts are too easy on drug dealers, Times-News, Dec.12 - was like reading a news article from the 1970s: Revolving-door courts, lenient sentences, weapons possession, gangs, blame the big cities, shortages of judges, fear of retribution and calls for a new approach. Nearly 40 years later not much has changed. Or has it? What Ms. Michael didn't tell our Allegany readers is that 1 in 32 Americans were under criminal justice supervision last year. Thanks to tough mandatory sentencing that incarcerates record numbers of non-violent drug offenders who are not dealers, the United States has the highest prison population in the world. Admissions of inmates are rising faster than inmate releases. We have only 5 percent of the world's population, yet we have 25 percent of the world's prison population. How many more cops, judges and harsher sentences do we need before this nation understands that we suffer, not from drug use, but from irrational, ineffective and costly drug laws? And, if anyone does suffer from drug use, why are those people channeled behind bars instead of into a doctor's office? Whereas we succeed in locking up our people, too often we fail in providing key social programs to support education, healthcare, childcare, and poverty. While Ms. Michael urged our readers to "inform yourself about the drug trade and gangs," she made no call for a balanced ticket. Instead, she issued a call to arms that was focused exclusively on law enforcement. Why only criminal-justice professionals? Where is her call to change the laws, to release non-violent drug offenders so that we can deal more effectively with hard crime? Why is she silent about programs for harm-reduction and treatment? Did it ever occur to her to urge doctors, priests, psychiatrists, rabbis, teachers and other consulting professionals to take a look at the human side of drug use? Instead of more judges, why not more teachers and doctors? If you have to put your money somewhere at least try to tackle the root of the problem. I don't think the criminal justice system was meant to replace the core of our consulting professionals, and certainly, not try to do their jobs! I especially don't think officers should be teaching kids about drugs. Too many wrongheaded people want to spend-up our budgets on criminal-law services to deal with the so-called drug problem, when, for the most part, drug use in this country doesn't require the attention of law enforcement. It isn't drug use that's the major problem - it's the black-market. Much of the "crime" anti-drug warriors wring their hands about stem from the amazingly lucrative employment and moneymaking in the (tax-free) black-market. OK, you've spent 40 years locking up our people who take advantage of a black-market that was literally created by the very legislatures you now urge us to vote for again. Have you lost your sense of decency? The uppermost shame we must all bear is not what we do to other nations, but what we do to ourselves. At no time in my youth did I think it possible I would live to see that cruel and perverse statistic: 1 in 32 Americans under criminal justice supervision. With the Congress in the lead, our various legislatures have placed a rope around the neck of the people. And when, in the course of governing the people where the law does more harm than good, it behooves even the unvoiced to speak up. I urge the Neighborhood Advisory Commission, city leaders and neighborhood associations to end this one-sided approach of lavishing your attentions on law enforcement at the expense of dealing with the underlying problems. And, where there is no problem - to leave well enough alone. While I support law enforcement, I also consider what other professionals have to say on the subject. May I recommend that readers check out the Drug Policy Alliance (www.drugpolicy.org) if you really "feel strongly about this issue"? Dave Crockett Cumberland - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake