Pubdate: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 Source: Ottawa Citizen (CN ON) Copyright: 2007 The Ottawa Citizen Contact: http://www.canada.com/ottawa/ottawacitizen/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/326 Author: Jake Rupert Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?137 (Needle Exchange) DRUG PROGRAMS 'CRUCIAL' TO CITY'S HEALTH Medical Officer Lauds Needle Exchange, Crack Pipe Plan The city's chief medical officer accused the police force, its chief and others yesterday of "actively" trying to thwart harm-reduction drug programs, such as the needle exchange and crack pipe program. Dr. David Salisbury said he's speaking out because the programs are "crucial" to the city's health, but police and others are undermining public confidence in the programs by spreading inaccurate information. "I've finally decided I can no longer stay silent about what people are saying about these programs," Dr. Salisbury said. "These programs are effective. We have major problems with HIV and hepatitis C in this city, and these programs are crucial to preventing the spread of disease." He said public comments from police Chief Vince Bevan have been based on incorrect information that such programs increase drug use and have little impact on the spread of disease. Not only do dozens of studies in other cities say this is wrong, Dr. Salisbury said, but the programs are starting to have positive effects on controlling the spread of disease in Ottawa. What makes him angry is that public support for the programs is waning because critics have created the perception that the programs don't work. "Public comments from the chief of police have led to serious problems for us," he said. "We don't have a good working relationship with the police force." Dr. Salisbury said he has repeatedly asked the police to put a representative on a city council-mandated board overseeing the programs, but, for the past 18 months, the police have refused. At the province's orders, municipalities must run needle exchange programs that allow addicts to trade in dirty needles for clean ones. However, the crack pipe program is a city initiative, and can be killed. Chief Bevan couldn't be reached for comment, but the force's spokeswoman, Const. Isabelle Lemieux, said his previous comments stand. Chief Bevan has said: "there is no hard evidence, no empirical studies that support the distribution of crack pipes;" the program encourages drug use; it sends the message that "it's OK to try crack;" and the program might even be illegal. He said he would consider charging the city under a section of the Criminal Code banning the distribution of drug paraphernalia, but then said he wouldn't if the pipes aren't given to people under 18 years of age. Const. Lemieux said Dr. Salisbury's concerns will be taken into consideration, and that police officials are committed to drug "prevention, treatment, harm reduction" and law enforcement. City Councillor Rick Chiarelli, who is against the program, said the doctor's remarks are unwarranted. "It's the job of the police to uphold the law," he said. "I think it was unfair of (the doctor) to go after the police on this because they are only doing the right thing, upholding the law." One of Mayor Larry O'Brien's campaign promises was to cancel the crack pipe program, and he will have a chance to do so during the budget debate next month. His spokesman, Mike Patton, said the issue is not a priority for the mayor, but that he will vote to cut funding if it comes up. Dr. Salisbury said cancelling the program would put public health at risk, but Mr. Patton said the "good doctor needs to realize he reports to council. "He can make any sort of recommendation he sees fit, but at the end of the day, it's council's decision which programs they are going to support." Dr. Salisbury said council spent $82,000 on these programs last year and is being asked to spend $59,000 in 2007. He said those amounts are negligible, compared to the cost of treating people with HIV and hepatitis C, so cancelling either program wouldn't make economic sense. Last year, a University of Ottawa study credited the crack-user program with radically reducing the sharing of drug paraphernalia, but also increasing the amount of crack smoking. The study was funded by federal, provincial and city governments. University of Ottawa epidemiologist Lynne Leonard said despite the increase in crack use, there was "significant scientific evidence" that shows the program reduces the harm associated with crack smoking. She said study officials saw "a huge, significant decrease in the use of injected drugs, which is far more risky than smoking." Earlier this week, it was reported that an opinion poll showed two-thirds of Canadians believe the federal government should treat drug abuse as a medical problem, requiring more prevention and treatment programs. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman