Pubdate: Tue, 28 Aug 2007
Source: Tallahassee Democrat (FL)
Copyright: 2007 Tallahassee Democrat.
Contact:  http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/444
Note: Prints email address for LTEs sent by email
Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v07/n994/a02.html
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/rehab.htm (Treatment)

CUT HARD TIME

Rehab Can Do More Than Cut Costs

James McDonough is one of the longest serving top state officials in 
Florida, having been the so-called Drug Czar for most of the Jeb Bush 
administration and now serving as secretary of the Department of 
Corrections under Gov. Crist.

He is also a man who has the wisdom and the gumption to try to lead 
the leaders, coming up with proposals such as this week's suggestion 
that his agency can save 10 percent by moving thousands of state 
inmates from prisons to work release, substance abuse and education programs.

The savings he projects would be twice what Mr. Crist has asked of 
the agency, but it isn't an easy proposal to swallow politically, 
however wise and far-sighted if managed with scrupulous regard for 
public safety.

Mr. McDonough wants to use the approach, releasing non-sex offenders 
- - with no escape history or domestic violence injunctions - three 
months early, to better prepare inmates to make a successful 
transition back into society. Right now about a third of inmates 
released from DOC, return, so the current system isn't exactly 
working when it comes to recidivism.

In a report Saturday in the Sarasota Herald Tribune, Mr. McDonough 
said he realized this would be a shift from more than a decade of 
hard-line policies - including those emanating from the governor's 
own "chain-gang Charlie" years. In the 1990s, then-state senator 
Crist lead lawmakers in mandating that all inmates serve 85 percent 
of their sentence, and promoted work on roadside labor crews.

But the governor said last week that he respects Mr. McDonough's 
"excellent judgment" and would like to see what offenders would be 
under consideration, and whether they would indeed pose little threat 
to the public.

This is an open-minded view not reflected in the Senate where 
criminal justice committee chairman Victor Crist (no relation to the 
governor) reacted more negatively.

It is indeed a concept to be considered very carefully, but clearly 
the need to make dire cuts in the budget is an incentive and 
opportunity to review any programs that may represent excessive 
loyalty to a political selling point, but cannot necessarily be supported.

For example, some 3,000 inmates who, nearing the end of their 
sentences, have already been out working in the public for sometime 
yet are staying in DOC institutions at night. Mr. McDonough, a former 
West Point-educated Army officer, said there is little risk in 
releasing these inmates to work-release centers, which still provide 
oversight, drug testing, garnished wages and so forth.

Another 3,600 inmates are coming from local communities that have 
sentenced them to a year and a day - just long enough to place them 
in a state prison instead of in an overcrowded local jail. Mr. 
McDonough contends many of these would be more effectively managed in 
halfway houses or substance abuse treatment centers instead of 
expensive state prisons, an approach that would promote a better 
transition for these short-sentence inmates back into society.

Given the state budget crunch, and the fact that the budget 
population has doubled since 1990 in large part due to laws that put 
long-term incarceration above vocational, education and mental health 
treatment - a review of programs that aren't truly effective but are 
excessively expensive is a prudent, probably necessary, and even 
professionally smart step to take.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom