Pubdate: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 Source: Now, The (Surrey, CN BC) Copyright: 2007 South Fraser Publishing Ltd. Contact: http://www.canada.com/surreynow Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1462 Author: Marisa Babic, Surrey Now Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Marijuana - Canada) A Cautionary Tale GROW OP/DELAYED INSPECTION CATCHES COUPLE IN CROSSHAIRS OF PROGRAM A Surrey couple has been caught in a web spun to nab pot growers. "We're a victim of someone else's grow-op and a victim of BC Hydro and a victim of the City of Surrey's procedures," says Jacquie Tomandl. Jacquie and Clayton Tomandl's troubles began after they bought a house in Fleetwood in December 2006 with the goal of renovating the 30-year-old house and reselling it for a profit. The couple paid $395,000 for the house and invested another $35,000 in extensive renovations. They ripped out the aging kitchen, bathrooms and floors and replaced it with modern features. But unknown to them, the house was on Surrey's Electrical Fire Safety Inspection list, an innovative program aimed at shutting down grow-ops in the city. Working in conjunction with the city, BC Hydro supplies addresses to the EFSI teams after spotting spikes in electricity in houses suspected of being grow-ops. To the couple's surprise, an inspection team arrived at their house in April of 2007 to check it for evidence of a marijuana growing operation. They say the house was rented out by its previous owner and suspects the owner was negligent about keeping tabs on his tenants. The couple was slapped with an inspection bill of $2,700 and the front door of their house still bears an orange sticker with the warning "Do Not Remove," -- a violation subject to a $10,000 fine -- above red notice stating "these premises have been used as a marijuana grow-op or a clandestine drug lab." Unable to sell their house, the couple has also had to swallow a $1,800 a month mortgage payments for several months now. As well, they still have to pay $1,600 to have the house tested for mould, damage caused to homes by the simulated moist greenhouse growing conditions for bumper pot crops. Samples were taken on Tuesday and they expect to have results and a clean bill of health soon. Clayton Tomandl says the couple has hired a lawyer and is looking for someone to sue. Surrey Fire Chief Len Garis said he couldn't comment on this specific case due to privacy issues. But Garis admits it's conceivable that some inspections fall though the cracks. Garis noted the EFSI team was expended in January 2007 to deal with nearly 1,000 addresses obtained from hydro that met the criteria of "unusually" high electricity consumption. With the pot grows so rampant, his two teams are having a tough time keeping up with all the files and are only able to do between 60 and 70 inspections a month. "I just don't have the resources to get to everyone instantly," he said. Garis said the inspection teams act on the cases in priority order based on which cases pose the most potential for fires -- apartments, townhouses and then single family homes. He also pointed out that homebuyers should be more vigilant about what they're buying and hire a private inspector to check a potential purchase, a recommendation by most mortgage brokers. "I'm surprised that most people, given this day and age and the amount of publicity that's been around this thing for the past four of five years, that people wouldn't be much more careful about what they're purchasing," he said. Jacquie Tomandl says their offer to the realtor, who also sold them the home they live in, was the fourth one made on the house and that he had reassured them that a private inspection was done. "We trusted him that the inspection was done and that it passed," she said. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake