Pubdate: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 Source: Trail-Rossland News (CN BC) Column: B.C. Views Copyright: 2007 Trail-Rossland News Contact: http://www.trailrosslandnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4398 Author: Tom Fletcher THIS IS YOUR CRIME PROBLEM ON DRUGS The Interior town of Williams Lake has done a good job of highlighting the problem of "prolific offenders" in recent weeks. Instead of playing down its distinction as B.C.'s crime capital as previous honourees Surrey, New Westminster and North Vancouver have done before, Williams Lake Mayor Scott Nelson has used police statistics to tackle the problem head-on. He's put the message out forcefully that the numbers are driven by a handful of hardcore repeat offenders who, especially in a small town, can generate a crime wave all by themselves. But the same story could be told in communities around the province, and it's usually a story about what people will do to get drugs. In Williams Lake and elsewhere they're demanding that repeat offenders be kept in custody until they are sentenced, so at least they can't rack up new crimes while awaiting trial. While that's an appealing idea, B.C. Solicitor General John Les reminds me of its major flaw. Career criminals (and their lawyers) prefer to maximize time "in remand" awaiting trial, especially if the evidence against them is a slam dunk. In a time-honoured (and naive) tradition, judges kindly give them two-for-one credit for time served while they are still technically innocent. Holding suspects creates another problem for the B.C. correctional system, which runs addiction programs for inmates. "The reality is they spend more time there in remand than actually sentenced, and when they're there on remand, there's not much we can do with them, because there's the whole presumption of innocence thing," Les told me. "You can't impose anything on them. And then when they're sentenced, typically they don't spend a whole lot of time there anyway." Another popular notion is that the threat of harsh sentences will deter the kind of impulsive property crime that plagues communities. But does it really? One sobering study done in 1992 examined the most direct of consequences, delivered by Irish Republican Army enforcers to juvenile car thieves in Northern Ireland: "kneecapping," or shooting the thief in the leg with a handgun. Did this reduce the number of car thefts? No. Other studies suggest that 80 per cent of car thieves believe they will never be caught, and that in the U.S., only about 14 per cent are caught. For those desperate for drugs, fear of consequences seems an even more remote notion. That's why today authorities are looking toward the community court or "drug court" model for solutions. Les has high hopes for B.C.'s community court pilot project, due to open next spring in Vancouver. Its goal is to deal with offenders quickly, giving them one shot at serving a sentence in a treatment program before going into the regular system. Les says the big city is the logical place to start, since it has the most treatment programs available, but smaller towns can benefit too, and Williams Lake has already begun talks with police and community agencies. Last week the federal government launched its latest anti-drug strategy, amid much squawking in the big-city media about a U.S.-style war on drugs, and the allegedly urgent need for more defeatist pest-holes along the lines of Vancouver's unsafe injection site. About half of the Stephen Harper government's $64 million anti-drug strategy is supposed to be directed to treatment programs. Given the Conservatives' ideological rigidity, that probably means abstinence-based programs, which by happy coincidence are the only ones that actually work. How will repeat offenders be made to stick to programs, and how will the public be kept safe? Les says he'll have more to say on that in a few weeks. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom