Pubdate: Mon, 15 Oct 2007
Source: Austin American-Statesman (TX)
Copyright: 2007 Austin American-Statesman
Contact:  http://www.statesman.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/32
Author: Jeremy Schwartz, Mexico City Bureau
Alert: Just Say NO To 'Plan Mexico' http://www.mapinc.org/alert/0352.html
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/areas/Mexico
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Felipe+Calderon

U.S. PLAN FOR DRUG WAR HAS SOME IN MEXICO WORRIED

Critics of $1.4 Billion Aid Proposal Fear the Money Will Bring 
Mexico's Drug-Fighting Strategy Under American Control.

MEXICO CITY -- A proposed massive American aid package to fight 
violent drug cartels has sparked a collective bout of hand-wringing 
in Mexico, where anything hinting at U.S. intervention has long been 
viewed with suspicion.

For months, Mexico has been consumed with news of the proposed 
package, although little has been publicly revealed besides its price 
tag: a reported $1.4 billion over two years, on par with what 
Colombia receives as part of its controversial drug-eradication program.

Mexico, which has had more than 2,000 drug-related slayings this 
year, might be expected to welcome such a bounty with open arms. But 
the nations' mutual history, which includes the loss of a third of 
Mexico's territory to the United States, makes any U.S. involvement 
in Mexico a touchy subject.

President Felipe Calderon's government has pursued American 
assistance, but opposition politicians have argued that the aid 
package would violate Mexico's sovereignty. Polls show that most 
Mexicans oppose the help.

Concern has centered not on the aid itself, which probably will be 
used to pay for military and law enforcement training and equipment 
such as helicopters, but on what might accompany it.

Analysts on both sides of the border say the aid most likely will 
come with some level of oversight from the U.S. Congress, which may 
be hard for Mexican agencies, unaccustomed to a public accounting of 
any kind, to swallow.

"There will be an enormous amount of scrutiny and a lot of questions 
on how the money is used and how effective Mexico's anti-narcotic 
strategy is," said Ana Maria Salazar, a Mexico City analyst and 
former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for drug 
enforcement policy and support. "That will always be an uncomfortable factor."

Presidents Bush and Calderon are expected to announce details of the 
plan in two or three weeks, when the proposals are expected to be 
sent to the nations' respective congresses for approval.

American officials have praised Mexico's recent drug-fighting 
efforts, saying military crackdowns on the cartels have disrupted the 
flow of drugs into the United States.

"Calderon has done a phenomenal job in addressing the cartels and 
criminal gangs," said U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-El Paso, who has 
pushed for the aid package. "I think they warrant and deserve our assistance."

Mexico's complicated relationship with the United States causes 
Mexican officials to chafe at comparisons to Plan Colombia, as the 
Colombian aid package is known, and to lecture reporters who have 
baptized the proposed aid package "Plan Mexico."

Analysts also worry that the aid may come with increased pressure to 
allow American agents to carry weapons and pursue drug traffickers on 
Mexican soil, long a goal of U.S. law enforcement.

Mexican and U.S. officials have insisted that the package will not 
include an American military presence in Mexico, as exists in Colombia.

Calderon's political opponents have railed against the package, some 
to make political hay, others because they fear the money will bring 
the nation's drug-fighting strategy under American control.

"Mexico is a country that can afford to pay the cost of the plan," 
Manuel Camacho Solis, a top official in the leftist Democratic 
Revolution Party, wrote recently in a newspaper column. "It 
represents just a small proportion of public and oil-related income. 
On the other hand, accepting the donation puts us completely in the 
hands of the United States government."

Leftists in Mexico have also expressed concern that the aid package 
could be used to go after guerrilla groups and other political 
opponents of the government.

Meanwhile, there is concern on both sides of the border about the 
Mexican military's human rights record and its effectiveness in 
fighting the drug cartels.

While the military's involvement was initially meant to be temporary, 
the aid plan could give it a permanent role. According to published 
reports, 40 percent of the money in the aid package would go to the 
military, and the rest would go to police agencies.

Calderon's decision after taking office late last year to step up the 
military's involvement in drug enforcement initially caused an 
unprecedented surge in violence. Mexico averaged almost 100 
drug-related killings a week earlier this year. Dozens of police and 
public officials were gunned down.

The violence decreased over the summer as the nation's two major 
cartels reportedly entered into a truce. Supporters called the truce, 
which proved short-lived, proof that the military pressure worked.

Critics said the violence had more to do with the internal workings 
of the cartels than with anything that Calderon's government did. 
Recently, violence has spiked again.

Human rights groups say the military has committed a host of 
atrocities during its battle with drug traffickers. Mexico's human 
rights commissioner has recommended sending the military back to its 
barracks, citing numerous abuses.

For example, four soldiers were sentenced in connection with the rape 
of 14 women in the border state of Coahuila in July 2006, and a 
family of five was gunned down as they drove through a military 
checkpoint in Sinaloa in June. Seven soldiers involved in the 
incident later tested positive for marijuana and cocaine.

"We could be entering a spiral in which we strengthen the presence of 
the military," said Jose Luis Pineyro, a national security expert. 
"Time will tell if there are more pros than cons with this plan."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake