Pubdate: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 Source: Western Mail (UK) Copyright: 2007 Media Wales Ltd Contact: http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2598 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Richard+Brunstrom Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?207 (Cannabis - United Kingdom) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/heroin.htm (Heroin) LEGALISING DRUGS WOULD NOT ADDRESS THE ISSUES NORTH Wales Chief Constable Richard Brunstrom is never afraid of speaking his mind, and, in an age when blandness and spin dominate public affairs, he can sometimes be a refreshing figure. But his views on the legalisation of drugs are wrong-headed, and the decision of the North Wales Police Authority to back them is baffling. Mr Brunstrom has long held the view that UK drug laws should be overhauled, and the fact that he has submitted a paper repeating that view - which extends to legalisation of all drugs and offering heroin on the NHS - is perhaps not too surprising. The councillors and other individuals who make up Police Authorities are not the people one would expect to sympathise much with Mr Brunstrom, particularly when the Authority and the chief have not always seen eye-to-eye. Yesterday, nevertheless, the North Wales Authority agreed there should be a review of the 1971 Misuse of Drugs Act, and allowed the Brunstrom report to be sent to the Home Office. They will argue, as Mr Brunstrom has done, that it is a radical solution to a serious problem. But being radical doesn't necessarily equate to being right. While there are some superficial attractions in the legalisation argument - one being that it prevents users from being brought into contact with dealers, another that it takes away the allure of behaving outside the law - there are many more underlying weaknesses. Legalisation will not make the problem of drug abuse disappear. The UK acting alone would also find itself a magnet for those in neighbouring countries who would want to take advantage of liberalised laws. And supporters of a move in that direction have failed to explain how legalisation - which would presumably make drugs more easily available - - would help protect the vulnerable. Drugs have ravaged many Welsh communities, and making the supply chain legitimate would not, we believe, address the social issues at the root of the problem. It is telling, too, that few of Mr Brunstrom's peers at senior levels seem to share his views. He dismisses those who disagree with him as "flat earthers", but the Home Office would be wise to note that he is the only one of 43 chief constables in Wales and England to have proposed the move. Bringing alcohol and tobacco under the remit of a new regime of dealing with drugs would also, frankly, be unworkable. There may be legitimate arguments over which substances should be categorised as class A, B or C drugs too - as there are over cannabis - - but that is a separate issue from legalisation. Mr Brunstrom is entitled to his views, and the Home Office has shown little enthusiasm for them so far. Thinking outside the box is all very well, but the Chief Constable's ideas, this time, should be left on the shelf. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake