Pubdate: Thu, 18 Oct 2007
Source: Manchester Evening News (UK)
Copyright: 2007 Manchester Evening News
Contact:  http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1313
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/rehab.htm (Treatment)

ADDICTS 'GIVEN MORE DRUGS'

COCAINE and heroin addicts on a government treatment programme are 
being given extra drugs as a reward for good behaviour, it has been claimed.

A survey of almost 200 clinics in England by the National Treatment 
Agency (NTA), found users were being offered extra heroin substitute 
methadone or anti-depressants for clean urine samples.

The NTA said the practice was unethical and it wanted to see certain 
practices 'squeezed out of the system'. A third of clinics in the 
survey said users who produced a drug-free urine sample may be 
offered increased doses of heroin substitute as a reward - known as 
'contingency management'.

A quarter admitted that clients can choose the type of substitute 
drugs they want.

The survey also found clinicians offering anti-depressants, cash 
vouchers or access to detox as a reward.

The NTA, which runs the UKP500m-a-year treatment scheme, said 
offering drugs for anything other than clinical need was wrong.

The agency's chief executive Paul Hayes said: "Giving extra drugs as 
a reward isn't a practice we would advocate.

"One of the things that's important before we start rewarding people 
through things like contingency management is to make sure that we're 
doing it according to the best principles for drug treatment.

"There are a range of practices associated with drug misuse that are 
not what we would want them to be."

Mr Hayes said the NTA was set up not only to expand the provision of 
drug treatment, but also to improve its quality.

While he says it is appropriate for other drugs to be prescribed 
alongside prescription drugs to help deal with the withdrawal 
symptoms, they should not be given as a reward and the agency 
'wouldn't advocate' such a practice.

He said doses of drugs should be determined by an individual's needs 
and not by whether or not they were co-operating with the programme.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman