Pubdate: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 Source: Ottawa Sun (CN ON) Copyright: 2007 Canoe Limited Partnership Contact: http://www.ottawasun.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/329 Author: Greg Weston Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?199 (Mandatory Minimum Sentencing) TORIES INVEST IN D&D In an effort to change the channel from the revolting Taser death of Robert Dziekanski at the hands of the RCMP, the Conservative government has rolled out three consecutive days of crime-fighting announcements. Judging by the public furor over the Dziekanski tragedy, the Polish immigrant's fatal 50,000-volt police welcome to Canada didn't exactly leave average folk yearning for more law-and-order this week. No matter. Stephen Harper's spin department apparently couldn't wait to roll out the Conservatives' new mantra for all things crime and punishment -- "deterrence and denunciation." A justice department background document defines deterrence as sentences that discourage "the offender and others from engaging in criminal conduct." Denunciation is another element of sentencing that reflects "society's condemnation of the offence." Young offenders, drug dealers and identity thieves are among those that the latest Conservative initiatives promise to deter and denounce. Some of the changes are worthwhile. Others not so much. It seems simple common sense, for instance, for authorities to be able to keep under-age psychos and repeat young offenders locked up pending trial. Similarly, some of the proposed changes announced this week are needed to help police and the courts deal with the exploding problem of identity theft that is helping to make Canada among the fraud capitals of the world. Unfortunately, on the issue of dealing with drug crimes, the Conservatives have once again opted for populist politics over effective public policy. The proposed changes would impose mandatory minimum prison sentences for "serious drug crimes" such as large-scale trafficking, pushing narcotics to kids, and running grow-ops. The official justice department bumpf proclaims: "The proposed reforms will target drug suppliers, and will send a signal to growers and traffickers that this illicit activity will not be tolerated, especially when it involves Canada's youth." Perhaps. But whatever message the Conservatives may be sending to the streets, it isn't likely to make them much safer from the scourge of drugs. First, we are not talking minimum sentences to lock 'em up and throw away the key. Far from it. The proposed new laws would impose minimum jail terms of from one to two years, plus another year or two for "aggravating factors" such as trafficking with the use of weapons or as part of organized crime. Fact is, most judges already operate within sentencing guidelines that are at least as onerous as those being proposed, if not more so. Serious drug trafficking can already mean life imprisonment, and that would not change under the new laws. While the occasional spectacular case of leniency in a drug case makes headlines, rare is the pusher who gets off without jail time for selling heroin in the schoolyard. The Conservative measures promise to take direct aim at druggies involved with organized crime. One criminal court judge tells me that if the new minimum sentencing laws were to have any deterrent effect at all, "it might be to scare off some of the small players (in the drug trade), and therefore actually be a bonus for organized crime. "And trust me, organized crime doesn't give a damn about penalties." - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake