Pubdate: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 Source: Bangkok Post (Thailand) Copyright: The Post Publishing Public Co., Ltd. 2007 Contact: http://www.bangkokpost.co.th/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/39 Author: Surasak Glahan Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Thaksin DEFENDING THE WAR ON DRUGS Veteran politician Chalerm Yubamrung recently joined the People Power Party (PPP) and is seen as its number two. Over the past month, he has expressed his ambition to become interior minister and revive the Thaksin Shinawatra government's controversial war on drugs, which led to the deaths of more than 2,500 people in alleged extra-judicial killings by police. Surasak Glahan asked him how he plans to revive the policy. Below are excerpts from the interview. Do you intend to use the same heavy-handed approach applied by the Thaksin administration? Drug suppression needs to be handled seriously, the same way the Thaksin administration did. Regarding the extra-judicial killings, people misunderstood that authorities killed innocent people. Instead, it could be that people were killed by their peers to cut the leads for authorities to pursue. I think the drug problem cannot be settled as just part of the national agenda, but must be seen as a security issue. I plan to have state agencies, such as the national police unit and the interior, education and public health ministries, working together in an integrated manner. There should be a system to distinguish small-time and medium-sized dealers from the big fish. We must regard drug users as patients and set up agencies to provide treatment and rehabilitation as well as counselling for them. In addition, all metropolitan and provincial police bureaus must have their own drug suppression unit. Will you set timeframes for achievement like the past government? We will work based on what the Thaksin government did, and will continue from there. We need to allocate a budget for this and inform people that it is a security issue, so no one will oppose it. We will declare a new phase of the war on drugs. We also aim to reduce the number of drug users, so there will be both prevention and suppression. Don't you think the implementation of this policy should be conducted in a careful and gradual manner? Illicit drug suppression cannot be handled gradually. It needs timeframes and targets, as well as authorities staying alert. But when there are mistakes and doubts, we need to clear the air promptly. It needs to be strictly, urgently and hastily handled with the provision of special taskforces. The Thaksin administration set a target for each province to list local dealers. Do you intend to do the same? It won't be changed. If we are worried about more extra-judicial killings, we have to find out first whether the killings, if they happen, were driven by large drug traders or by authorities. Should people be concerned about whether innocent people will be victimised by this policy, or by more extra-judicial killings? There won't be victimisation of innocent people. Those who were affected are not the real innocents. The police did not just break into someone's bedroom and shoot them. Critics said the past government's policy was hastily implemented with timeframes set for achievement, and thus it forced authorities to produce an outcome and resulted in the killings. Do you agree? No. That's just criticism. When you work, you need to set targets. The past government just intended to curb the problems. But the policy affected mostly small-time dealers and innocent people, while the big fish still got away with it. Is your strategy focused on the big fish? I cannot be specific now. But it is necessary to go after small-time dealers and medium-sized traders as well because that is how the drug trade operates. The Thaksin government set up a very good suppression format, and we will only make some additions. Will you support the work of the committee, appointed by the current government, investigating the war on drugs policy? Yes, so that we can prove who the real culprits are. Once the panel's investigation results come out and certain authorities are found guilty, will you ensure justice for the victims? Absolutely, the culprits must be punished, but those who are not guilty should be protected as well. Do you think the Thaksin policy had any faults, and if so how do you plan to correct them? There were not any failures. Some people just accused the then government. There was a high number of killings, but no one knew who carried out the activities. Is the war on drugs policy a political gimmick to instigate fear as well as trying to gain votes from fretting parents? No. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake