Pubdate: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 Source: Yakima Herald-Republic (WA) Copyright: 2007 Yakima Herald-Republic Contact: http://www.yakima-herald.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/511 Author: James Joyce III and David Lester RANDOM DRUG TESTS FOR COPS RULED OUT An arbitrator has ruled that the city of Yakima cannot impose a mandatory random drug testing program on its police officers, handing Police Chief Sam Granato and City Manager Dick Zais a big setback. Seattle arbitrator Mike Beck nixed the proposal because no comparably sized city has random drug testing, and because the city failed to prove that a drug problem existed on the police force or that mandatory testing would deter drug use. It was the one major issue left over from a lengthy contract negotiation. The decision, issued Tuesday, leaves in place the current "reasonable suspicion" policy that police union officials argued would more quickly identify violators. Granato and Zais had proposed to randomly test 25 percent of the force each year. Beck, an attorney and arbitration specialist, ruled on the basis of comparing contract provisions in comparably sized West Coast jurisdictions, since no federal or state constitutional provisions apply. "It is fair to conclude that these (other comparable) jurisdictions either do not believe that a random drug testing program would serve as a deterrent to drug use, or if a random drug testing program can be considered a deterrent to drug use, such a program presents other difficulties which have persuaded these jurisdictions not to implement random drug testing," Beck wrote. The random drug testing proposal had been a bitterly fought issue since Granato first proposed it on the eve of contract renewal talks in 2005. The police union, the Yakima Police Patrolman's Association, had argued that the city made the proposal to pressure the union to accept a wage freeze. On Wednesday, the association hailed Beck's decision. Sgt. Bob Hester, the association's president, said "our members are glad this is finally over and we have been vindicated. We have been saying all along that we have a clean and professional department and, clearly, the arbitrator agreed." City officials reacted with disappointment, saying Yakima residents are entitled to expect law enforcement officers to be drug-free. Zais suggested that the city would lobby state legislators to require random drug testing in contracts for all public safety employees. "The community deserves to have the highest level of confidence that its police officers are not impaired and are completely fit for duty," Zais said in a news release Wednesday. "Random drug testing would go a long way toward accomplishing that. ... Despite the opinion of the arbitrator, we'll keep working to achieve that goal." In an interview, Mayor Dave Edler said he, too, is disappointed the issue even had to be arbitrated. "I would hope we could come to a place where police and fire would be willing to submit to random drug testing," he said. "I absolutely believe it's time for the labor units to do that." The arbitrator's decision would appear to end the long-standing issue at least on the contract level, since both sides agreed to submit the dispute to binding arbitration, which requires both sides to abide by the outcome. Granato has been pushing for random testing since he became chief in 2003. Random testing of some city employees The city put the random drug testing issue on the table at the start of talks for a new labor agreement more than two years ago. Both sides declared an impasse in the talks last fall, agreeing to submit 17 issues to binding arbitration. The two sides later reached settlement on all items but the drug testing issue, which went to a hearing before Beck in June. Beck's ruling is the result of that hearing. Yakima already requires random testing for 172 employees, including Granato, captains and lieutenants in the police department. Emergency dispatchers for police and fire also are subject to testing, as are all city employees holding a commercial driver's license. Fire department battalion chiefs will be randomly tested beginning Jan. 1. All those employees except those holding a commercial driver's license have voluntarily agreed to the testing. The city sought to extend the policy to the 120 commissioned officers and sergeants covered by the police patrolman's association. But, Beck noted, they have not agreed to random testing and he couldn't determine what percentage of the city's total employees are subject to random testing. So, he said, the city's argument that it simply wanted to treat the police officers the same as other employees didn't wash. Hester said the union wanted to negotiate strengthening the reasonable suspicion policy, which was adopted in 1990. He said the city refused, instead demanding random testing. While rejecting random testing, Beck did side with the city on several issues that add stronger language to the reasonable suspicion testing policy. He accepted the city's language that defines suspicion as circumstances strong enough that a reasonable person would suspect that an employee is under the effects of drugs and/or alcohol. In so doing, Beck rejected the union's proposal that the suspicion must be corroborated by a second person. Reporting fellow officers Hester argued police officers are motivated to seek help for fellow officers they suspect are impaired. "We have to make life-and-death decisions in a very short period of time," he said. "No one is willing to work with someone who is impaired and not able to provide proper backup and support." But Beck rejected another union proposal that would have allowed officers who become aware of another officer's impairment to assist the impaired officer in getting help, rather than requiring them to report the condition to the impaired officer's supervisor. Beck approved the city's proposal to require reporting to the supervisor. In an interview, Granato said he's not convinced a police officer would turn in another member of the force and risk incurring that person's anger. He said random testing is the added deterrent needed to make the system work. "We are dealing with human nature here," Granato said. "While you would like to believe that is what all employees would do, I think it is unrealistic to expect that." The city had argued that the arbitrator should approve its random drug testing proposal because the public favored it. Granato said he was disappointed that the arbitrator decided the city hadn't proved that public support, and that Yakima couldn't establish such a system unless a similar-size jurisdiction previously did it. "This arbitrator is saying if you want to try something new, there's no way to get it done," Granato said. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek