Pubdate: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 Source: Buffalo News (NY) Copyright: 2007 The Buffalo News Contact: http://www.buffalonews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/61 Author: Rod Watson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/racial.htm (Racial Issues) RACIAL DIVIDE HUGE IN DRUG PUNISHMENT The first county-by-county look at U.S. drug imprisonment rates uses hard numbers to document what many already know: The drug war is primarily waged against African-Americans "despite solid evidence that they are no more likely than their white counterparts" to use or sell drugs. And Erie County is one of the places where that drug war hits blacks hardest. "In Erie County, African-Americans are admitted to prison for a drug offense at 30 times the rate of whites," according to the Justice Policy Institute, which analyzed per-capita drug imprisonment rates in large counties. That ratio ranked Erie County 26th out of the 198 counties in the new study, "The Vortex: The Concentrated Racial Impact of Drug Imprisonment and the Characteristics of Punitive Counties." The local disparity is best summed up by City Judge Robert T. Russell Jr., who presides over Buffalo's drug court and is a past chairman of the National Association of Drug Court Professionals. "Mind-boggling," Russell said when told of the study's local findings. JPI, citing other research, notes that it's not that blacks use or sell drugs more. Other studies have shown little difference between the races. For instance, the federal government's 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health showed 9.8 percent of blacks using drugs in a given month, compared with 8.5 percent of whites. Granted, the crime associated with the inner-city drug trade might account for some of the disparity. But the vast majority of those arrested are not kingpins or gang members; they're low-level sellers, many of whom are addicts themselves, said Jason Ziedenberg, JPI's executive director. And those kinds of users and dealers exist in the suburbs and rural communities, as well. So why the huge disparities? Part of it is the view that, when blacks are involved in a crime, it's a personal failure worthy of punishment, whereas when whites are involved, it's a societal problem worthy of treatment. Whites also are likely to have better lawyers, the study noted. Mandatory minimum sentences also hit blacks harder, as do disparate policing policies. Put it all together, and you have a concentrated effort that disproportionately disrupts African-American lives, families and communities and pushes too many blacks outside of society's margins. And if you think that makes sense, ask yourself one question: What would the "war on drugs" look like if the prison admission rates for blacks and whites were reversed? We know what the answer would be. But don't count on too many people even asking that question. Erie County District Attorney Frank J. Clark said that he hadn't seen the study but that he'd already seen enough in an e-mail from the Onondaga County DA to dismiss it. Critics contend that the study distorts reality by, for instance, not factoring in the relatively small size of the black population in some counties. The Onondaga County DA complained to a Syracuse newspaper that he could "prove the Earth is flat if I used their methodology." But if cops, prosecutors and judges take that attitude and dismiss the thrust of the study, that's exactly the kind of Earth they must be living on. All they have to do is stroll through a prison with their blinders off. "Why are we playing a numbers game here?" asked Ziedenberg, whose JPI wants to end the U.S. overreliance on prison. "Why aren't we talking about solutions to these problems?" You can bet we would be . . . if whites were disproportionately targeted like this. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom