Pubdate: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 Source: Sun News (Myrtle Beach, SC) Copyright: 2007 Sun Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/mld/sunnews/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/987 Author: Jason M. Rodriguez, The Sun News PROCESS FOR DRUG TESTING IN STUDY Brunswick School Panel Gets Proposals for Monitoring Staff BOLIVIA, N.C. - Two drug-testing firms presented proposals Friday to a Brunswick County, N.C., schools committee as a plan to randomly test school-system employees inches closer to being implemented by July 1. The safe schools committee - composed of school board members and school system employees - heard from Whiteville, N.C.-based Southeastern Drug Testing Services and Wilmington, N.C.-based Castle Branch about urine and oral drug-testing techniques and costs. The school system began looking at random drug testing for its staff in late 2006 after North Brunswick High School Assistant Principal Greg Morris was charged with possession of marijuana and indecent exposure while attending a school-related conference in Atlantic Beach, N.C. Safe schools committee Chairman Charlie Miller, also a school board member, said he does not think many employees of the school system have drug problems. "It's just the right thing to do for the safety of our employees and our kids," Miller said. Half of the school system's 400 bus drivers are now randomly tested on a quarterly basis at a cost of about $35,000 annually, which includes testing all new hires. If the board votes to randomly test staff, at a cost of $35 per person under Southeastern's plan, that total price tag could be between $55,000 and $60,000, school officials have said. The school system has about 1,600 additional employees who would be subject to the tests. Only 10 percent would be randomly selected for the tests each school year under the proposal being considered. School officials estimate about 580 new hires would also be tested annually. Alton Ray Melton of Southeastern said his company works with schools in Bladen and Columbus counties, as well as several community colleges. His proposal would test staff members' urine for the presence of drugs and could include alcohol for an additional cost. He said his company can combine random testing with selective testing if the school system suspects someone of drug use. "You have some who cannot help themselves," Melton said and added that the school system must have a policy in place that addresses positive drug tests. He suggested that those who test positive for drugs be treated as the state treats those with commercial driver's licenses who test positive: They are fired on the spot. Miller said the board would develop a policy that would offer treatment options. "There needs to be a step process," Miller said. "I want to offer some help if the tests come back positive. I want it as discreet and as private as possible." Angela Gilbert, drug testing administrator for Castle Branch, presented a plan that uses oral swabs to test people for drug use. Unlike Southeastern, which would send a company representative to administer the test, Castle Branch would designate a school staffer to monitor the test. "Who better to know when your teachers are available than your administrators," Gilbert said. Gilbert, who said Castle Branch does not administer tests for any schools under the university level, said testing oral fluids can detect drug use within about an hour of use, whereas it takes four to six hours for urine tests to detect use on a drug test. Under Castle Branch's plan, each urine test would cost $49 and each oral test would be $35. There would also be a charge for mileage expenses for the person who administers the urine test. The safe schools committee did not finalize a recommendation on whether to suggest to the full school board that random tests should be implemented. The committee is scheduled to meet again March 1. - --- MAP posted-by: Elaine