Pubdate: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 Source: Janesville Gazette (WI) Copyright: 2007 Bliss Communications, Inc Contact: http://www.gazetteextra.com/contactus/lettertoeditor.asp Website: http://www.gazetteextra.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1356 Author: Todd Richmond, Associated Press Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) STATES CREATE MORE REGISTRIES TO TRACK, DETER CRIMINALS MADISON, Wis. - Police found 29-year-old Leah Gustafson in a pool of blood in her apartment last year. Next to her was her collector sword. She'd been stabbed through the heart. A blood trail led police in Superior, Wis., to an apartment across the street, where her killer, Jason Borelli, had just gotten out of the shower. Borelli got life in prison. "This is something nobody else should go through," said 32-year-old Kelly Ziebell of Superior, Gustafson's friend since high school. "It feels like an empty hole without her." Motivated by the murder, Ziebell and others who knew Gustafson have spent the past year pushing lawmakers in Wisconsin and Minnesota to join a growing a number of states that have created a variety of databases to let the public know the whereabouts of criminals. Modeled after the ubiquitous sex offender registries, the new online databases tell users whether the person mowing the lawn next door ever cooked methamphetamine, kidnapped a child or killed somebody. Supporters say people deserve to know whether they might be in danger. "That would make people more cautious about who their neighbors are," Ziebell said. Critics counter the expanded registries are as flawed as those devoted to sex offenders. They make politicians look tough on crime, but trample privacy rights, set up registrants for harassment and do little good. "It's another example of people, quote, trying to get tough on crime when they should get smart on crime," said Michael Iacopino, a member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers' board of directors. "Legislatures didn't have the spine to basically say, whoa, what's the outcome of these community notification provisions?" Every state has a sex offender registry. With them have come lawmaker proclamations that they are cracking down on the worst of the worst - as well as complaints of harassment and stories of offenders unable to find a neighborhood that will accept them. More states are taking the registries further, tracking a wider swath of convicts. Montana, Florida, Kansas and Oklahoma track violent offenders. In 2005, Tennessee created a registry for convicted methamphetamine manufacturers. Last year, Minnesota and Illinois followed with their own meth registries. And in August, Ohio allowed judges to decide whether to place someone found liable for assault or battery in a child sexual abuse case on a registry. The registries generally include names, photographs, addresses and convictions. Tennessee's meth manufacturer registry lists about 550 people. It got 500,000 hits in its first six months, said Jennifer Johnson of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation. Tennessee state Rep. Charles Curtiss, D-Sparta, said landlords deserve to know whether they're renting to someone who could revert to old ways and build a lab that drives down property values or exposes people to hazardous chemicals. "If they make meth inside of a dwelling, it's a tremendous expense to clean it up," Curtiss said. "The public's rights outweigh an individual's rights." Wisconsin state Rep. Scott Suder, R-Abbotsford, is drafting legislation to set up a violent offender registry at the urging of Gustafson's friends. Its fate is unclear - Republicans control the Assembly, but the bill could run into trouble in the Democrat-led Senate or with Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle. The state's sex offender registry alone costs about $1.9 million annually. Still, Suder wants a database that would include murderers, kidnappers, arsonists and terrorists. "If you've committed a serious, violent offense of this nature, I think, frankly, you deserve to be on a registry and that's the price you pay," Suder said. "It's simply saying the community has a right to know what they did." Kyle Smith is deputy director of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, which administers that state's sex offender and violent offender registries. He said the registries deter criminals from re-offending. "Does it actually do some good? I suspect it does," Smith said. But critics argue police already have systems to check criminal backgrounds. What's more, they say, most violent offenders don't get out of prison for decades and chances are slim they'll reoffend. Research on sex offender registries' impact on repeat offenses is limited, since they must be tracked over years, said Charles Onley, a researcher at the Center for Sex Offender Management in Silver Spring, Md. The number of rapes in three of 10 states with registries dropped from 1990 to 2000, according to a draft study by criminologists at the University of Arkansas-Little Rock, an independent research firm and the University at Albany State University of New York. But the study concluded registration and notification had no influence on the number of rapes committed in the states as a whole. The study has yet to be published. Wisconsin's Suder acknowledged a violent offender registry may not have saved Gustafson. Her killer's lengthy rap sheet included several disorderly conduct charges, but it's unlikely they would have landed him on a violent offender registry. "It certainly may not have solved or prevented what happened to Leah Gustafson," Suder said. "But I think the more community notification and awareness the better, particularly when it comes to these serious, violent offenses." Summary Tracking Offenders: Lawmakers in Wisconsin are looking at starting a database of violent offenders that would include murderers, kidnappers, arsonists and terrorists. Other states are setting up similar registries, tracking a wider swath of convicts. What You See: The registry would be similar to sex offender databases found in every state and put names, photographs, addresses and convictions online. Pros And Cons: Supporters say people deserve to know if they have potentially violent neighbors. Critics say such registries make politicians look tough on crime, but trample privacy rights and do little good. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman