Pubdate: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 Source: Salmon Arm Observer (CN BC) Copyright: 2007 Salmon Arm Observer Contact: http://www.saobserver.net/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1407 Author: Tracy Hughes WHAT'S YOUR ANSWER TO RISING CRIME? The face of crime in this community is changing. It's getting uglier, darker, more sinister. Crime is becoming more prevalent, with more of us at risk of becoming victims than ever before. There are many reasons why. Our population has increased being the obvious one. Police sources point to another ---drugs. Substance abuse has always created issues for the police, just think of the resources spent dealing with drunk drivers. However, the increasing use of drugs including the harder and more addictive substances like cocaine, heroin and crystal meth are a major factor in Salmon Arm's crime rate. Break-ins are linked to drugs, as addicts will steal anything to try and feed their habit. Assaults are linked to drugs as people lose control of normal inhibitions or get caught up in situations where they can't afford their habit and are physically punished for non-payment. Sex is exchanged for a fix. Homes are converted into grow operations as others want to take advantage of the quick bucks to be made in producing weed. In talking with police and court officials, it becomes clear Salmon Arm is no longer dealing with the petty crimes of yore. I can attest to that, just from my own experience. Eleven years ago, the police beat I?wrote used to contain items like stolen bicycles and kids throwing snowballs at cars. It's not that those things don't happen any more, I'm sure they do. But they just don't make the pages of the paper any longer. Not when you have items like armed robberies, or assaults with metal pipes or fires caused by makeshift marijuana grow-operations. But while both the number of crimes and the severity of the crimes being committed has increased, the police force has seen little growth. An RCMP report regarding staffing levels at the Salmon Arm detachment says it has an inadequate number of on-road police personnel to meet the workload and deliver a minimum level of police service. Basically, the RCMP itself is saying this detachment is having trouble meeting the minimum standards of policing for our community. It calls for the addition of three new officers immediately. Yet, even with adding three officers, it is still only going to be enough to meet minimum standards of police service. It's a huge issue for our community. How do you balance the need to enforce crime and protect our citizens with the cost of doing so? The force is looking to the municipality to fund two additional officers, which would equate to roughly a two per cent tax increase in your local tax bill. Council members want to hear from the people of this community about this. What would you cut so more can be spent on policing? Less road maintenance or snow removal? Fewer upgrades to parks? No more grants to non-profit groups??Or would you prefer to pay more taxes for policing? If you don't speak up, you'll just have to put up with what council decides. While a public meeting on this topic was originally scheduled for Thursday evening, it has now been postponed. The city reports they hope to hold the public forum sometime in March or April, but nothing is definite. - --- MAP posted-by: Steve Heath