Pubdate: Mon, 06 Aug 2007
Source: California Aggie, The (UC Davis, CA Edu)
Copyright: 2007sThe California Aggie
Contact:  http://www.californiaaggie.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2725
Author: Lizeth Cazares
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hemp.htm (Hemp)

YOLO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUPPORTS HEMP BILL

Bill Would Allow Hemp Farming In Yolo County

The Yolo County Board of Supervisors agreed unanimously  to support 
Assembly Bill 684 Tuesday.

If passed, AB 684 would allow for the industrial  farming of hemp in 
four California counties - Imperial,  Kings, Mendocino and Yolo 
counties - for the next five  years, in spite of federal law which 
classifies the  plant as a controlled substance and prohibits hemp farming.

Yolo County staff recommended the county support for  the bill 
because hemp production can be beneficial to  the county, said Petrea 
Marchand, manager of  intergovernmental affairs for Yolo County.

"Staff is recommending support because Yolo County  agriculture may 
benefit sometime in the future from an  availability of another 
crop," she said.

While the county may benefit, Marchand also said the  federal 
government still outlaws the possession of hemp  seeds and that 
farming hemp is not financially viable  because there are no nearby 
hemp processing plants.

Several supervisors showed their support during the meeting.

"I think we should support this and see what happens,"  said 
supervisor Helen Thompson. "Perhaps this is a  niche area for some 
Yolo county farmers who are  creative."

Supervisor Mariko Yamada said the county staff made an  effort to 
find farmers' opinions and most were in  support.

Supervisor Matt Rexroad also asked the opinion of the  local police 
enforcement and said they had little  opposition because this product 
is seen as distinct  from marijuana.

But despite the unanimous support, there were some  concerns raised 
by the board.

Rexroad said he was concerned about people's negative  perceptions of 
hemp, and how that could affect the  county's agriculture business. 
He said he heard Butte  County declined taking part in this bill 
because they  worried the county's agriculture industry would be 
hurt  because of hemp's association with marijuana.

Others, including bill sponsor and Representative Mark  Leno (D-San 
Francisco), said production of industrial  hemp will have financial 
and environmental benefits.

"This is a $270 million industry that's growing at 10  percent a 
year," he said. "Industrial hemp can be used  to make food, clothing, 
homes and fuel that are all  biodegradable."

While federal law still prohibits the production of  industrial hemp, 
Leno said counties that are part of  the pilot program will be 
protected by the law.

Because hemp has less than .03 percent  Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 
compared to marijuana which  has 3 to 10 percent, the law will 
require the Drug  Enforcement Administration to routinely check 
hemp  crops for THC content, according to the bill. Any hemp  crops 
found in violation will be destroyed.

Despite possible drawbacks, Leno said this will be  beneficial to the 
state's agriculture.

"I think it will be a great opportunity for California  family 
farmers," he said.

The bill passed the Assembly floor and is awaiting vote  by the Senate.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth Wehrman