Pubdate: Mon, 5 May 2008 Source: Guardian, The (UK) Section: Lead Editorial Copyright: 2008 Guardian Newspapers Limited Contact: http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardian/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/175 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?207 (Cannabis - United Kingdom) WARPED PERCEPTIONS Drugs may open the doors of perception, but drugs policy seems bent on weaving perceptions out of thin air. Last week, headlines proclaimed a new crackdown on cannabis. Based on unattributable briefings, which bypassed the bar on official announcements ahead of the May Day elections, the stories said the drug would be shifted back from class C into class B. That may create the hallucination of action, but it will achieve nothing more substantial. The stories gained credence when the prime minister publicly described new strains of cannabis as "lethal", as if they could trigger a fatal overdose. That is as fanciful as the idea that sending a moral message will do any good. True, cannabis has got somewhat stronger and - for a minority of users - there is evidence of a link with disabling psychosis. But Whitehall's own panel of experts has concluded that increased marijuana use has not been matched by a corresponding rise in mental illness. As a result it is reported to have rejected reclassification. Even if the science were different, changing the law would be a mistake - for it will not cut cannabis use. From the 1970s until 2004 harsh dope laws sat on the statute book as a symbol of political resolve, yet with every year that passed more people smoked the drug. A new crackdown now will be even more of a sham, as the current policy shows some signs of working. After cannabis was downgraded four years ago it became more straightforward for police to confiscate and caution. Figures last month showed a big rise in the warnings being handed out - around 20,000 extra cannabis smokers annually are being dealt with by the police. For the first time since records began, cannabis is falling out of fashion: the British Crime Survey shows that the proportion of young people trying the drug has fallen by four percentage points since 2003. Whether or not that is connected to the new laws, going back to the approach followed through the decades when use was relentlessly rising would be perverse. Which is why it is not going to happen. For dubious reasons, the police chiefs are backing reclassification. But they said last week that they would not revert to the days when cannabis possession gave rise to automatic arrest, something that wasted so much time that officers often turned a blind eye. If the policy on arrest is not changing, the only effect of reclassification will be to threaten cannabis smokers with five-year prison terms. As in the past, that threat will be no deterrent as users know it will be imposed only rarely. But a small minority, who for whatever reason the authorities turn against, will find themselves thrown into jail. For them, a policy based on appearances rather than fact will come at a very real price. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake