Pubdate: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 Source: Billings Gazette, The (MT) Copyright: 2008 The Billings Gazette Contact: http://www.billingsgazette.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/515 Author: Sharon Sloane Note: Sharon Sloane is president and CEO of Potomac, Md.-based WILL Interactive, Inc., which has produced a program used in more than 10,000 U.S. scho ols to educate students about the abuse of prescription drugs. She has 25 years of experience in producing cutting-edge instructional systems for behavior modification and performance improvement technology and holds a master's degree in counseling from the University of Connecticut and a bachelor's degree in education from Boston University. Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/opinion.htm (Opinion) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Marijuana) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?232 (Chronic Pain) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/meth.htm (Methamphetamine) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/oxycontin.htm (Oxycontin/Oxycodone) PRESCRIPTIONS NOW TEENS' DRUGS OF ABUSE While drug education programs have contributed to the decline of illegal drug use among American youth, the abuse of prescription drugs by teens continues to rise. In fact, according to a federally financed study released last month by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) at the White House, illicit drug use by teens has continued to gradually decline overall in 2007, but the use of prescription painkillers remains popular among young people. So while we have been fighting a battle to educate our youth about drug abuse on one front, another front has quietly opened and expanded. The nation's education programs on drug abuse have had success in shaping perceptions of street drugs and those that abuse them. We've seen the use of amphetamines, methamphetamine, and crystal methamphetamine decline significantly, while marijuana use has modestly decreased from 11.7 percent in 2006 to 10.3 percent in 2007. It seems that the message that these street drugs are illegal, dangerous and potentially deadly has reached teens and had an impact on them. The risks of abusing prescription drugs, however, have not been communicated. Education Gap The Office of National Drug Control Policy reported in February 2007 that three out of 10 teens believe pain relievers are not addictive, and 1/3 of teens believe that there is "nothing wrong" with occasional abuse of prescription medication. Further, the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health reported 47.3 percent of teens obtained pain relievers from friends for free; 10.2 percent took them from a friend or relative without permission; and 10 percent bought them from a friend or relative. These findings suggest that there is a perception that misusing prescription drugs is safer than using street drugs. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is the current proliferation of over-the-counter and prescription drugs used at all levels of our society. The increased use of these medications by parents, role models and other authority figures sets a tone for teens and shapes their opinions. Another factor that influences teens is accessibility. These drugs are available at their local pharmacy or in the family medicine cabinet; if they are legal and readily available they are viewed as trustworthy. The need to broaden the front lines of the drug education battle to include prescription and over-the-counter medicines is substantiated by the development and expansion of the survey used by NIDA over the course of its 33 years. NIDA began its Monitoring the Future study in 1975 to survey the use of drugs by 12th-grade students. A significant development occurred in 1991 when the survey was expanded to include eighth- and 10th-graders. Revisions to the survey over the last five years have alerted us to the wider view of drug abuse that we must now consider. The 2007 survey reported that the proportion of eighth-graders reporting use of an illicit drug at least once in the 12 months prior to the survey has fallen to 13 percent from 24 percent, a drop of nearly half. While this is certainly encouraging news, we're also facing the more somber news that at least one in every 20 high-school seniors has taken OxyContin, a powerful narcotic drug, in the past year. The percentage of students using Vicodin was 2.7 percent, 7.2 percent and 9.6 percent in eighth, 10th and 12th grades, respectively. So our mission is clear. We are winning the battle against certain illegal drugs. But, if teens are just switching to alternative sources, what have we really gained? Take a New Tack Current government education programs are merely shifting teens from illicit street drugs towards prescription and over-the-counter drugs because the latter are more accessible, easier to ingest, legal, and seen as safe when used widely and openly by authority figures such as parents. Authority figures taking drugs should be aware of any impact their use may be having on impressionable youth that surround them. Teens may simply be taking the path of least resistance, both physically and mentally. What is required is a focus on the underlying root of the problem. We must concentrate on decision-making, judgment, critical thinking and how, why, and under what conditions teens make behavioral choices. The key to success lies in teaching youth how to think rather than what to think. This learning must occur with great attention paid to the context of teens' real life experiences, the stresses and resources at their disposal and the unique physical and emotional characteristics of this demographic. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake