Pubdate: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 Source: Eagle-Tribune, The (MA) Copyright: 2008 The Eagle-Tribune Contact: http://www.eagletribune.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/129 Authors: Brian Messenger and Jarret Bencks Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) NH POLICE EXPECT CHANGE IN MASS. DRUG LAWS WILL HAVE AN IMPACT Local police say they expect last week's vote to ease marijuana laws in Massachusetts will have an impact on this side of the border as well - they just aren't sure what it will be. "Anytime we talk about the decriminalization of a drug, I'm sure it will affect how we do business," Salem police Capt. Shawn Patten said. "We're just not sure how yet." More than 2 million Massachusetts voters supported Question 2, which called for the decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana. Those caught with an ounce or less will be forced to give up the drugs and pay a $100 fine instead of criminal penalties. Those under 18 will be required to complete a drug awareness program or face a stiffer $1,000 fine. Pelham police Lt. Gary Fisher said the changes to Massachusetts law won't directly affect how his department operates. But he speculated that the town could begin to see more marijuana in small quantities. "We may find more people possessing less than an ounce, but there's no way of telling that until it starts to happen," he said. A similar measure to decriminalize the possession of up to a quarter of an ounce of marijuana was approved by the New Hampshire House of Representatives earlier this year. But it was shot down by the Senate in May. Rep. David Welch, R-Kingston, who supported the bill, said he expects the matter to come up again in the future, especially given what happened in the Bay State last week. "New Hampshire still needs to take a look at that," he said. "I think Massachusetts will be a test case, and we will look at the results before bringing forth any legislation." Already, Massachusetts police say they are concerned that the new, weaker marijuana laws will lead to increased drug use. Groveland, Mass., police Chief Robert Kirmelewicz said he fears drug dealers will take more chances selling marijuana, especially to younger people. The current penalty for possession of small amounts of marijuana in Massachusetts is up to six months in jail and a $500 fine. "I feel this will not only encourage the use of marijuana in communities, but will also empower drug dealers to sell marijuana to our children, knowing the absence of criminal prosecution," Kirmelewicz said. "I am very disappointed with the passing of this law. "What I envision is that they (dealers) carry less than an ounce of marijuana on them so they don't have to worry about prosecution. You're talking a $100 fine. A speeding ticket is more money than that. It's crazy. You're going to let a guy you would normally arrest walk away with almost an ounce of pot." Haverhill, Mass. Deputy police Chief Donald Thompson said the new guidelines simply don't make sense. Under the new rules, he said, an 18-year-old stopped for a routine traffic violation who is found to have under an ounce of marijuana on him would not be arrested. But if the same person has a single, unopened beer in the car, he would be subject to arrest. "I don't think people thought it through," Thompson said. The revised law is expected to go into effect in late December or early January, or 30 days after the governor is presented with official election results. Until that time, possession of any amount of marijuana is still a criminal offense, according to Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, who is working to determine what the new rules will require the legal system to do. Essex County District Attorney Jonathan Blodgett, who opposed Question 2, met with Coakley, other district attorneys, and representatives from the state Executive Office of Public Safety and Security on Friday to discuss the implementation of the new law. Many questions remain as to exactly how the law will be enforced, Blodgett said, including whether a central registry will be created to keep track of marijuana possession fines; how challenges to a fine will be handled; and how the state's Department of Family and Children will handle the drug education awareness component of the law. He said the district attorneys are also asking Gov. Deval Patrick to provide assistance to local police departments so they can train officers to enforce the new law fairly and uniformly across the state. Blodgett said he has been in contact with local police departments and will be scheduling a formal meeting shortly. Methuen, Mass., police Chief Katherine Lavigne said she is confident the state will work everything out before the new rules take effect. "They'll be working on that and getting back to us," Lavigne said. "We have some time before this is implemented." Supporters of the ballot question said the new law will spare thousands of people from having a criminal record, which can make it harder to get a job, student loan or gain access to public housing. They also argued that taxpayers would save $30 million in costs associated with marijuana arrests. In written statements before the election, Blodgett said it is a myth that first-time offenders charged with marijuana possession go to jail and pick up criminal records in the state of Massachusetts. Under state law, he said individuals charged with marijuana possession are placed on probation, and upon successfully completing probation, their records are sealed. Thompson, Haverhill's deputy police chief, questioned why state officials failed to invest in an advertising campaign before the election to show the public the risks associated with approving Question 2, chief among them that its passage could lead to more drug abuse among young people. "I'm disappointed the state didn't put up a fight," he said. With the passage of Question 2, Massachusetts becomes the 12th state in the country to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana. Material from the Associated Press was used in this report. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin