Pubdate: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 Source: Edmonton Journal (CN AB) Copyright: 2008 The Edmonton Journal Contact: http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/letters.html Website: http://www.canada.com/edmonton/edmontonjournal/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/134 Author: Paula Simons, Staff Writer MORE POLICE WON'T SOLVE CRIME PROBLEM Stelmach's Ministers Have Quietly Rolled Out Low-Key Package Of Social Measures His name is Stelmach. Ed Stelmach. And he'd like you to know he's tough on crime. Statistics that show crime rates falling don't distract him. Alberta's top gun knows the citizens of his province have been unnerved by the kind of brazen drug-linked violence that has plagued cities across Alberta this autumn. He knows, too, that with both the Liberals and New Democrats constantly asking about police funding in the house, and with the mayor of Calgary, Alberta's unofficial opposition leader, making police funding a huge issue, he has to give the appearance of being as tough on bad guys as anyone else. So it's no surprise that in the first three weeks of the fall session, Ed Stelmach spent a tremendous amount of time talking tough on crime. He and his ministers announced funding for more police officers, for more probation officers, for a program for provincial sheriffs to be given the authority to shut down suspected drug houses and other dens of iniquity, and for a plan to track hard-core repeat offenders after release, criminals whom Stelmach referred to dramatically as "the worst of the worst." Yet at the same time, the Stelmach government has actually rolled out over the last three weeks is a low-key package of remarkably progressive measures to fight the root causes of crime, common-sense initiatives aimed at keeping kids out of trouble and addicts out of jail. Among the announcements in the last three weeks: - - A $747,650 grant for a Calgary pilot project to provide long-term supportive housing to women and children fleeing domestic violence. - - Funding for 20 addiction treatment beds, specifically reserved for youth between the ages of 18 and 24. - - A $757,000 grant to a pilot project aimed at finding permanent, supportive housing for 80 residents of Edmonton homeless shelters. - - An $18-million grant for Metis settlements, aimed at creating more affordable housing, greater workforce participation, and improved community policing. - - A $4.8-million grant to a Calgary program that provides housing, along with intensive medical, psychiatric, and social support services to the most at-risk homeless. - - A $60-million Safe Communities Innovation Fund for pilot projects that prevent or reduce crime at a grass-roots level. Half the money will go to community-police partnership projects, while the other $30 million will be for community-based initiatives like providing mentors for aboriginal children or parenting support for families at risk. - - Even the $10.4-million repeat-offender monitoring program that Stelmach described as a crackdown on the "worst of the worst" turns out to be more akin to progressive social intervention than Big Brother surveillance. The government plans to track 60 chronic recidivists after their release from jail. But despite the premier's tough-guy bluster, these criminals won't actually be the worst of the worst -- but the most desperate of the desperate. The people targeted by this program won't be murderers and rapists, but the sorts of repeat offenders who break into 50 cars a night in order to feed a drug habit. And sensibly enough, the program won't just be aimed at monitoring them, but at providing them with housing, addiction treatment, and mental-health care. That's a lot of smart social spending -- but it's been announced without much fanfare, largely cloaked in a cloud of over-the-top tough-guy rhetoric. It looks as if Stelmach and his senior ministers would rather play to people's fears, and play to the party's social conservative base, than trumpet their commitment to progressive social policy. But I'm happy to embarrass the government, by pointing out that what it's doing is a heck of a lot smarter that what it's saying. We can't stop crime simply by hiring more police and prosecutors or building more prisons. If we want to tackle violence, theft, and vandalism in any meaningful way, we need to confront the root causes and social determinants of crime, things like poverty, illiteracy, addiction, homelessness, mental illness, and domestic abuse. Teach a kid to read. Get that kid to graduate. Protect that kid from abuse and neglect. And lo and behold, you'll have a kid who's far less likely to get hooked on drugs or join a gang, or steal your car. We don't often think of things like hot-lunch programs or all-day kindergarten classes or adult literacy mentorships as crime-reduction strategies, but they are. This session, the Stelmach government has taken some great first steps in the right direction. What a sad commentary it is on our times, and our political culture, that our leaders seem to feel the need to shelter behind the tired old crime-fighting cliches, instead of taking this opportunity to help create a new kind of public understanding. As as society, we can't sit passively by and expect the police to solve all our problems. All of us need to play a role in making this community safe -- by fortifying our social defences. And that, ironically, may be the toughest challenge of all. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin