Pubdate: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 Source: Willits News (CA) Copyright: 2008 Willits News Contact: http://www.willitsnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4085 Author: Linda Williams Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115 (Cannabis - California) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal) MEDICAL MARIJUANA UPDATE: CARDHOLDERS RIGHTS RE-ENFORCED AND CO-OPS AND DISPENSARIES HAVE NEW RULES Part 1 appeared in the November 12 TWN and covered the recent action by the California Supreme Court and the specific protections provided to valid state medical marijuana cardholders. The court is currently reviewing the three medical marijuana cases of the People vs. Kelly; Phomphakdy; and Wood and is expected to eventually rule on whether the current medical marijuana Health and Safety Code violates the state constitution and/or whether there was an alternative to invalidating the entire section. In August 2008, the California Attorney General issued a comprehensive set of "guidelines to ensure the security and non-diversion of marijuana grown for medical use." The guidelines reinforce specific protections to medical marijuana patients holding a valid state issued card against arrest and seizure. For those claiming medical marijuana protection without a card, the issue may be left up to the courts to resolve. For co-ops, collectives and dispensaries, implementation of the newly issued guidelines will likely change how medical marijuana is grown and distributed to patients in California. Attorney General guidelines to law enforcement for patients or caregivers For patients without a state issued card, officers are authorized to continue any search or investigation following standard law enforcement procedures. Standard procedures allow an officer to detain a suspect as long as they have reasonable suspicion, but they require "probable cause" for search, seizure, or arrest. If the officer reasonably believes the medical claim is valid, based on all evidence available and the person possesses no more than the state or local possession guidelines, the person should be released and marijuana not seized. Officers are not required to accept a person's claim of having a verbal physician's recommendation if it cannot be readily verified with the physician at the time of detention. If the officer has probable cause to doubt the validity of a medical marijuana claim, the person may be arrested and marijuana seized. It will then be up to the person to establish his or her medical marijuana defense in court. Guidelines for medical marijuana collectives, cooperatives and dispensaries: Medical marijuana collectives, cooperatives and dispensaries must operate on a not-for-profit basis. Collectives and cooperatives composed of qualified patients and primary caregivers may only acquire marijuana grown, transported or distributed by qualified co-op members. Each co-op must file articles of incorporation with the state and conduct its business for the mutual benefit of its members. Medical marijuana sales are subject to sales tax, seller's permits and business' licenses. Marijuana may be provided free, in exchange for services, allocated based on fees calculated to cover expenses or a combination of all three. Nothing in the medical marijuana laws allows marijuana to be purchased from outside a group for distribution to its members. Instead, the cycle is expected to be a closed loop of marijuana cultivation and consumption with no purchases or sales to or from non-members. To help prevent diversion of medical marijuana to nonmedical markets, collectives and cooperatives are expected to document each member's contribution of labor, resources, or money to the enterprise. They also should track and document the source of all marijuana distributed by the co-op. Many existing dispensaries, which do not follow the rules of co-ops or collectives, are not protected by current medical marijuana law. Those that merely require patients to complete a form designating the dispensary owner as their primary caregiver and then offering marijuana in exchange for cash "donations" are likely unlawful. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin