Pubdate: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 Source: Province, The (CN BC) Copyright: 2008 The Province Contact: http://www.canada.com/theprovince/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/476 Author: Joey Thompson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction) DRUG CONFERENCE HIGH ON HARM REDUCTION Pastor Wonders Why She Was Excluded From UN Forum For a region thick with addicts and thin on rehab beds, it's logical to assume a global forum on solving the world's drug woes would want to encourage talks on various recovery initiatives. At least Gloria Kieler, a faith-based, go-clean worker in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside for the past 16 years, thought so. The East Hastings storefront pastor expected treatment and rehabilitation to be the operative buzz-words when delegates from 70 non-governmental groups (NGOs) gathered this week for the UN-stamped forum in Vancouver that's supposedly rooting for a drug-free world. Not only were rehab and recovery missing from the agenda, she was too, as was Urban Core, a committee of 40 DTES groups who work in the trenches daily to help drug addicts and needles users get clean. In fact, few who have publicly criticized harm-reduction programs that ignore the need for treatment options were told of the international event, much less invited to discuss why they believe governments should adequately fund detox, stabilization and treatment facilities before investing in harm-reduction schemes -- needle exchanges, crack pipe give-aways, injection sites, that sort of thing. Yet forum organizers from the University of Victoria's Centre for Addictions Research didn't fail to add the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users to their guest list as well as harm-reduction cheerleaders Philip Owen and Larry Campbell. It's just a coincidence that the centre is also a known harm-reduction advocate, isn't it? And that its website is long on reducing the harms associated with drug use but short on measures aimed at ending it? And that its freshest research initiative claims Victoria -- which has almost no recovery beds -- has an urgent need for a shooting gallery, er, supervised-consumption site. While sister conferences unfolding in other North American cities appear open-minded, research centre folks boast of being the only ones to invite supporters of harm-reduction and drug-policy reform. All the more reason to ensure proponents of rehabilitation first, harm-reduction second, are among them to generate open, frank discussion. "If VANDU can suddenly speak for harm reduction internationally, why can't people like myself and the Urban Core speak on treatment recovery internationally?" Kieler e-mailed centre director Dan Reist. Local matters, or the need for services, is not what this forum is about, he replied. It's simply to gather ideas and collect information related to international policy. "The focus is on how NGOs can better engage with governments and UN agencies." Fair enough, but the two-day talk-fest's specified goal -- mapped out as a United Nations review of how to improve international drug-control efforts -- was to solve the world's drug problems, not solve the health issues related to them. The Vancouver forum looks more like a rah-rah session for harm-reduction buffs, and less like a world-class symposium aimed at reviewing the UN's 1998 commitment to work towards a "drug-free world." My prediction: Drug abuse in the Downtown Eastside will continue to thrive, perhaps even grow, as long as the harm-reduction folk who tout maintenance, rather than abstinence, control B.C.'s billion-dollar addiction services industry. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom