Pubdate: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 Source: Tribune-Democrat, The (PA) Copyright: 2008 The Tribune-Democrat Contact: http://www.tribune-democrat.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/4063 Author: Zachary Hubbard Note: Zachary Hubbard is a retired Army officer and freelance writer residing in Upper Yoder Township. He is a member of The Tribune-Democrat Reader Advisory Committee Unfinished Business AMERICA HAS FORGOTTEN HOW TO ACHIEVE VICTORY Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution grants the executive branch command of the armed forces. Article I, Section 8 grants the legislative branch the power to declare war. The last time Congress declared war was on Dec. 8, 1941. On that day, President Franklin Roosevelt concluded a speech with these words: "I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, Dec. 7, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire." Just as it had for President Wilson in 1917, Congress voted for war. The framers of the Constitution gave the president command of the armed forces, but knew it was the American people who would ultimately pay for going to war. Therefore, they gave the people's elected representatives the power to declare war. The American people have paid for wars through the years with their personal treasure and the lives of their sons and daughters. The framers never envisioned today's situation - a weak Congress that has handed the president the power to take the nation to war. Since Congress gave this power away, it appears America has forgotten how to finish a fight. We finished two world wars by forcing the unconditional surrender of our enemies. Unfortunately, most of America's major military conflicts since Congress stopped declaring wars have been left unfinished. Unfinished wars are messy. The Korean War has been in a cease-fire since we signed an armistice with North Korea in July 1953. A half-century later, North Korea is still a thorn in America's side. Today, we have more than 27,000 American military personnel in South Korea to prove it. We didn't finish the fight in Vietnam. A war-weary United States departed in a hurry, signing the Paris Peace Accords in January 1973. In the aftermath, thousands of former South Vietnamese military and government officials were killed or imprisoned by the new communist government. In neighboring Cambodia, the Khmer Rouge toppled the government and committed massive genocide. America led a large coalition in 1991 to eject Iraqi occupation forces from Kuwait. We stopped short of bringing down Saddam Hussein's regime. That's because American wars today have limited objectives, falling short of total victory. The Marsh Arabs of southern Iraq, who at our government's urging rose up against Saddam, were crushed by Saddam's troops after coalition forces withdrew from the region. Saddam drained their wetland areas, destroying the livelihoods of half a million fellow Iraqis. In 2003, America returned to Iraq to finish the job. We're still there, and it still isn't finished. Prior to returning to Iraq, we invaded Afghanistan to bring down the Taliban government that was backing terrorism against the West. We're still there, too. In February 2006, the Department of Defense published the Quadrennial Defense Review, a 20-year global security projection that provides broad planning direction for the U.S. military. The report's preface states: "The United States is engaged in what will be a long war." Since that day, many officials in the Bush administration refer to the "long war" instead of the "war on terror." I hope the current war isn't another long war. America loses long wars. I put Korea at the top of the list of failed long wars. There are others that stand out, though. President Lyndon Johnson declared a "war on poverty" in 1964. Nearly 45 years later, poverty is a major problem in America. President Richard Nixon declared a "war on drugs" in 1971. More than 35 years later, there are thousands of American military and law-enforcement personnel fighting that war. Declaring war on things (terrorism, drugs and poverty) doesn't work as well as declaring war on other nations. Things don't surrender - nations do! Americans should be fed up with presidents declaring long wars. We also should be fed up with a Congress that authorizes and funds them. But why should members of Congress want to stop? When wars go well, they claim credit. When wars go badly, they point the finger of blame at the other party or at their opponents in the next election. Meanwhile, many in Congress feather their own nests by attaching spending earmarks to the bills used to fund the long wars. Maybe it's time for Congress to reclaim its constitutional authority to declare war. Even better, maybe it's time for "we the people" to reclaim our constitutional authority and start demanding that our elected representatives truly represent us. The decision to go to war is too important to be placed in the hands of one elected leader. The desires of the people must be part of the decision process before going to war. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake