Pubdate: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 Source: Vancouver Sun (CN BC) Copyright: 2008 The Vancouver Sun Contact: http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversun/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/477 Author: Douglas Coleman Note: Douglas Coleman is a Vancouver doctor specializing in addiction treatment. DRUG ADDICTION IS PROBLEM ONE We Can't Deal With The Myriad Diseases Devastating The Downtown Eastside Until We Tackle The Underlying Cause In the late 1980s HIV/AIDS disease started to appear in intravenous drug users in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. Vancouver's medical health officer at the time, Dr. John Blatherwick, called for funding for a needle exchange program as a means of reducing the risk of addicts sharing syringes and thus spreading HIV. Unfortunately, as our local NEP has never required an exchange of "used for new" syringes and because up to 40 per cent of those obtaining syringes from this "giveaway" program continue to share their needles, the number of lethal syringes circulating within the drug using community has increased, our communities have become dumping grounds for used needles, and Hepatitis C and HIV rates have skyrocketed to levels exceeding those in Third World countries. With the AIDS epidemic no longer confined to individuals marginalized by sexual orientation, and as the number infected with HIV escalated, efforts were made to control the spread of this virus. However, because the initial response to this epidemic was an attempt to reduce the spread of the HIV disease itself, addiction was considered a secondary problem. Those with expertise in treating addiction disorders were not consulted or given the opportunity to influence either the types of studies done on the chemically dependent population living in the DTES, or the types of treatment provided to these individuals. Thus was born an enormous social experiment, now failing badly, that leaves the very disorder which drives the spread of HIV disease -- drug addiction -- untreated. Misconceptions about addiction disorders abound. It is not poverty that causes chemical dependence; rather it is the addiction disorder, and the compulsive use of drugs (including alcohol) that in many cases cause the kind of crippling poverty seen in the DTES. Addiction is not just a phase of development, it is an illness. There is an enormous body of scientific/medical evidence which both identifies and describes substance dependence disorders as well as the treatment options that have proven effective in their treatment. All mood-altering substances disrupt the function of the central nervous system, the most evident manifestation of this disruption being intense euphoria. In addition to the change in mood, however, as drug use becomes compulsive, judgment and impulse control are impaired, moods become unstable, and the stress of day-to-day living becomes overwhelming. As the addiction progresses, partnerships disintegrate and families fall apart. Ultimately, the addict can no longer work and is faced with a life of destitution. When large groups of such individuals are drawn to one area because of drugs and services that enable their addictions, and when the situation is further complicated by an epidemic of infectious disease and untreated mental health problems, the result is what has become so readily apparent in the DTES. Addiction is defined as the continuing use of drugs, accompanied by problems caused by that drug use. Despite an awareness of the often life-threatening problems caused by drug use, the addict cannot help wanting to take drugs (intense cravings and compulsion) and thus loses control of his/her drug use. Left untreated, this addiction disorder causes extreme social marginalization, institutionalization or death. Addiction is, literally, a disorder where the brain wages war against itself. It is a soul-destroying disease. These unvarying conditions associated with addictive drug use are described in a formalized fashion in medical textbooks and constitute the criteria which are used worldwide to diagnose addiction disorders. It is important to recognize that addiction disorders are clinical entities unto themselves. They are not caused by other mental disorders, although they may mimic any number of other mental illnesses, including depression, schizophrenia, attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or bipolar illness ("manic depression.") Although addicts may well suffer from other emotional or mental disorders such as those mentioned above, those conditions will not respond to treatment unless the co-existing addiction disorder is identified and treated aggressively. As with many chronic diseases (diabetes, coronary artery disease, asthma) there are no cures for addiction disorders. However, like other chronic diseases, they respond well to treatment -- provided the recovery efforts remain consistent. Treatment options include counselling, intensive outpatient programs, residential treatment, prolonged periods resident in support recovery facilities, and participation in 12-step programs. Although there may occasionally be a role for medications like methadone, abstinence from all mood-altering drugs, including alcohol, is the critical condition upon which further recovery efforts must rest. To suggest to an individual addicted to crack cocaine, and thus suffering from an illness which is defined by an inability to control drug use, that he or she now control or "cut back," or otherwise use that drug in a safer manner, fails to recognize the fundamental contradiction inherent in such a suggestion. Recommendations of "controlled use" serve only to cause further emotional, physical, psychological and spiritual damage, and may be ultimately fatal. There are no wrong reasons for an individual to enter into a recovery program. Nor is treatment reserved for those who want to go: Coercive treatment - -- treatment in order to save a job or a marriage, or instead of jail time -- can be effective. That such compulsory treatment is effective in producing sustained recovery is well documented by regulatory agencies overseeing the conduct of physicians, lawyers, pharmacists, airline pilots, professional drivers, police officers and teachers. Sustained recovery in more than 90 per cent of those coerced into treatment, and closely monitored for periods of up to five years puts a lie to claims that "treatment doesn't work." Such sustained recovery delights the addicts and their friends and family. Finally, as in any chronic disease, there are interruptions in recovery, and episodes of non-compliance with treatment recommendations that allow the disease to re-emerge. Recovery is a long-term process, much akin to losing weight and becoming fit. Setbacks do not constitute failure, either of the treatment program, or of the recovering addict. These are commonly part of the recovery process, and should indicate only a need to re-examine the recovery program, and make modifications as necessary. In the DTES we are once again dealing with a marginalized group, which has been provided with "services" but no treatment, a place to inject drugs, but limited access to detox beds, and advice on how to "safely" use crack pipes and needles, but no instructions on what must be done to abstain and build a life in recovery. Given the magnitude of the problem now evident there must be both a willingness on the part of the municipal, provincial and federal governments to embrace a medical model of addiction and its treatment, and a financial commitment to funding such treatment -- it will be expensive -- preferably in a decentralized fashion so that the DTES is no longer the focus of all our efforts. Douglas Coleman is a Vancouver doctor specializing in addiction treatment. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek